Latest News :- The Supreme Court on Wednesday rapped Karnataka High Court Justice Sreeshananda for making controversial remarks about the Muslim-dominated part of Bengaluru during a court hearing. It also said that no part of India can be called Pakistan. Justice Sreeshanand of Karnataka High Court had called the Muslim dominated area of Bengaluru as Pakistan during the hearing of the landlord-tenant case. He had also made misogynistic remarks against a female lawyer, the video related to this had gone viral on social media.
After this, on September 20, Supreme Court Chief Justice T.Y. A 5-member bench headed by Chandrachud took cognizance of the matter and heard the case on its own initiative. A report in this regard was sought from the Karnataka High Court Registrar. In such a situation, the Supreme Court bench hearing the case on Wednesday accepted the apology of the High Court judge and closed the case.
In this regard, the bench said, “Since the High Court judge was not the litigant before us, we do not want to pursue the matter further. We want to complete the hearing. We believe that in this electronic age the expectations from all companies will be to improve their features. “Judges should also improve their qualities.”
No one can call any part of India Pakistan. Basically it is against the territorial integrity of the country. Such controversies should not give rise to demands to stop live telecast of court proceedings. These facilities have become a medium for people to get justice from anywhere.
Judges, lawyers, and clerical staff must all be aware that court proceedings reach people outside the court who are not directly involved in them. Judges should be aware that every human being has a tendency based on his life experiences. Judges must be conscious of their biases. The mind and soul of a judge should be impartial and only then we can give true justice.
Karnataka High Court judge apologized. Keeping in mind the interest of justice and the dignity of the court, we do not wish to pursue the matter further, bearing in mind that a judge of the High Court has categorically apologized in the court proceedings. Respecting the dignity of the judiciary, we have completely refrained from sending a notice to the High Court judge.”
Comments are closed.