Big decision of Supreme Court, now there will be no hearing on demolition of Babri Masjid, petition rejected

News India Live, Digital Desk: Justice Sanjeev Khanna and Justice B.V. Nagarathna’s bench refused to hear the petition which sought to stay the incident of 6 December 1992 or reopen the legal aspects related to it. Key Highlights of the Hearing: The case is completely over: The bench said that the decisions of the lower courts and the High Court have already come on the demolition of Babri Masjid and the criminal cases related to it. The special CBI court had acquitted all the accused in 2020, and reopening it now is an abuse of law. Ayodhya verdict final: The judges reminded that on November 9, 2019, the constitutional bench of the Supreme Court had unanimously given its final verdict on the Ayodhya land dispute. Now there is no justification for any new petition related to that incident. Waste of time: The Supreme Court expressed displeasure at the petitioner and said that the precious time of the court is being wasted by bringing such cases, while many other important issues are pending before the country. Advice: The Court made it clear that “History cannot be changed through court orders, nor does social harmony increase by uprooting the dead bodies.” Background: Babri-Ayodhya Legal journeyYearImportant event1992The disputed structure (Babri Masjid) was demolished in Ayodhya on 26 December. 2010 Allahabad High Court’s decision (order to divide the land into three parts). 2019 Supreme Court’s historic decision: The disputed land was given to Ram Lalla, ordered 5 acres of separate land for the mosque. 2020 CBI court sentenced all 32 accused including Advani, Joshi to demolition. Acquitted in the case. 2024Consecration of the newly constructed Ram temple in Ayodhya. What was the demand in the petition? The petitioner had argued in his petition that the 1992 incident was a “historical injustice” and its legal validity should be re-reviewed. However, the court rejected this argument outright that this case is now beyond the scope of judicial review because the final decision has come on it.