Controversial American financial leader and convicted sex offender jeffrey epstein One issued from the files of latest photo Two of the biggest faces of the tech world — Elon Musk And mark zuckerberg — has been brought back into the limelight. In this picture both of them have a dinner party Epstein himself “wild” Told.
This photo and email document are from 2015 August month When Epstein e-mailed this photo to himself. In this dinner it is believed that LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman And PayPal co-founder Peter Thiel Like other prominent tech entrepreneurs were also involved.
What is the story?
Jeffrey Epstein in 2008 Minor sexual crimes and trafficking He was convicted as a criminal, but even then he remained associated with upper class people. newly released american Department of Justice (US DOJ) The documents reference Epstein’s dinner parties, which he described in an email as “wild.”
In the picture, both Musk and Zuckerberg are seen sitting at the same dinner table, while some other people were also present nearby. This photo was taken when Epstein’s guilty record was already public. Although These pictures or files do not prove that these tech leaders did any wrong.but this controversial dialogue and photos have sparked debate across global media and social networks.
Musk and Zuckerberg’s stance
In recent months Musk has publicly claimed that he Never attended any of Epstein’s parties. and Epstein’s strict action against crimes has endorsed. In this episode, Musk said that he does not know Epstein personally and he Epstein’s private island Repeatedly rejected offers for such places.
At the same time, the representative of Meta (Facebook) said that between Zuckerberg and Epstein only brief meeting It happened and after that they did not keep in touch.
What is the dispute?
These files and photos again highlight questions about how Epstein, who despite being guilty of a child sex crime How to stay connected to people in high-social networks. However, this does not stand against any major tech leader. legal charges are not imposed, but moral and social questions Questions are being raised as to why he was seen with such people at that time and in what context.
Comments are closed.