45324ddea5f602542e39a112ff34d4cb
Latest News :- India suffered crushing defeats on the spin pitches of Pune and Mumbai, handing New Zealand an unprecedented defeat in a 3-match series in India. In the Bengaluru Test match, the fast bowler was out for 46 and lost both Henry and Rourke. The test failed. As Kaundamani says in a film, 'Oh no, they are from a different state, a different country.' But the defeat of the Indian team on the rank turner pitches of Pune and Mumbai is very sad. Now the Indian team has come to such a situation where they neither know how to play fast bowling nor how to play spin bowling.
Ian Chappell has written that the use of the word baseball in a very derogatory manner to make fun of England's spin bowling and kicking and India's spin bowling is ridiculous. This is what Ian Chappell wrote on the ESPN Cricinfo website: Failure to bat is never a good feeling. The point is that India have succumbed to both the pace and spin of New Zealand at the very worst time. India should have shown strength, not collapsed, in that series, which required a lot of skill and work like Australia.
The defeat in Pune was mainly due to India's poor performance on the spin pitch. He was out for 46 runs against the fast bowlers in Bengaluru and was out for 36 runs in Australia, but then came back and won the series. It must be said that not only did India lose, but the New Zealand team destroyed India in both bowling and batting. India's batting is bad on a rotating pitch. The reaction to those failures has become worse and more devastating than the failure itself. As far as response is concerned, it seems that Mumbai have been trained to break the line and play sweep shots accordingly.
Apart from this, the way England has batted on spinning pitches recently is also ridiculous. The way the Indian team practiced after two defeats is as ridiculous as England's spin bowling. Top class batsmen do not need to break lines on the pitch. They already know which ball to hit and which not to hit. My only question is why there was no decisive action from the Indian batsmen in the Pune Test. England's propensity for multiple sweep shots is ridiculous. What is the use of such shots? Pakistan's 2 spinners (Noman Ali, Sajid Khan) took 39 wickets in 40.
Coming back to the sweep shot, I ask who is that idiot coach who says reverse sweep is safe in Test cricket? Where did the crucial foot traffic go? How dangerous the meaningless reverse sweep shot is in Test cricket became clear when Yashasvi Jaiswal bowled in Mumbai. (Ashwin in the second innings). Reverse sweep is dangerous in test cricket. Because that shot is already decided. Rather, precise footwork is the correct movement for spin pitches. Some players can be good batsmen at all types of sweeps, but most rely on good footwork.
Chandanar, who did wonders with the white ball in Pune, took 13 wickets. The way star batsman Virat Kohli was out in the first innings shows that his footwork is lacking. Sandner's footwork did not work for a normal delivery. India's poor and poor batting against New Zealand seems to be adding to the problem ahead of the tough tour of Australia. Ian Chappell said this.
Comments are closed.