U.S. Bans 5 Europeans Accused of Pressuring Tech Co. to Censor American Speech Online

U.S. Bans 5 Europeans Accused of Pressuring Tech Co. to Censor American Speech Online/ TezzBuzz/ WASHINGTON/ J. Mansour/ Morning Edition/ The U.S. government announced on Tuesday that five European citizens have been barred from entering the country, accusing them of leading efforts to pressure American tech companies to suppress or censor U.S. viewpoints. The move is part of the Trump administration’s broader campaign to counter foreign influence on digital platforms by targeting individuals through immigration enforcement.

Quick Look:

• Visa Bans Announced:
  Five European figures, including NGO leaders and a former EU commissioner, are now prohibited from entering the United States. The State Department accuses them of coercing U.S. tech platforms into censoring American voices online.
• Rubio’s Statement:
  Secretary of State Marco Rubio characterized the individuals as “radical activists” and said the U.S. will no longer tolerate “extraterritorial censorship.” He cited new visa policies introduced in May aimed at punishing those involved in suppressing free speech protected under the U.S. Constitution.
• Named Individuals:
  The five Europeans barred from entry are:
  • Imran AhmedCEO of the Centre for Countering Digital Hate
  • Josephine Ballon and Anna-Lena von Hodenbergleaders at German-based HateAid
  • Clare Melfordhead of the Global Disinformation Index
  • Thierry Bretonformer EU Commissioner for Internal Market and Digital Affairs
• Focus on the Digital Services Act (DSA):
  The visa action stems in part from European enforcement of the DSA, which mandates large tech platforms to remove harmful or illegal content, including hate speech. Breton, a central figure in creating and enforcing the DSA, previously warned Elon Musk against broadcasting an interview with then-presidential candidate Donald Trump, claiming the stream could amplify harmful content.

U.S. Bans 5 Europeans Accused of Pressuring Tech Co. to Censor American Speech Online

Deep Look:

Secretary Rubio claimed the five individuals had spearheaded campaigns that violated U.S. principles of free expression. His post emphasized that “for far too long, ideologues in Europe have led organized efforts to coerce American platforms to punish American viewpoints they oppose.”

Sarah Rogers, Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy, echoed those sentiments on social media, calling Breton the “mastermind” behind the DSA and accusing him of threatening platforms like X (formerly Twitter) for allowing interviews with Trump.

European Response

Breton responded on Tuesday, reminding U.S. officials that all 27 EU member nations voted to approve the DSA in 2022. “To our American friends: ‘Censorship isn’t where you think it is,’” he wrote.

French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot condemned the visa bans, insisting that the DSA applies strictly within the EU and has no extraterritorial impact. “What is illegal offline is also illegal online,” he wrote, reiterating that the DSA’s scope does not extend to U.S.-based speech or platforms.

How the Ban Will Be Enforced

While most Europeans can enter the U.S. under the Visa Waiver Programthey must still apply through the Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA) managed by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). A U.S. official confirmed that some or all of the five individuals have likely been flagged within DHS systems, effectively barring them from entry despite not requiring visas.

This approach marks a significant shift, using immigration law and visa policy—not platform regulation or financial sanctions—to address what the administration calls “foreign censorship” of American speech.

Part of a Broader Immigration Strategy

The visa bans are not isolated. This year, the Trump administration has also:

• Imposed new financial bond requirements for visa applicants from selected countries
• Rolled out travel restrictions targeting visitors from parts of Africa, the Middle East, and the Palestinian territories
• Expanded visa scrutiny for individuals accused of promoting digital censorship

The administration’s actions signal a growing willingness to use visa policy as a tool for enforcing free speech protections internationally, particularly when foreign actors are seen as pressuring U.S.-based platforms.

More on US News