US Intelligence Agency Chief Tulsi Gabbard refuted President Donald Trump’s claims, saying Iran was not making nuclear weapons…

New Delhi. A recent statement by US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has raised big questions. Tulsi Gabbard said in written testimony given to the Senate Intelligence Committee that Iran’s nuclear enrichment capability was completely destroyed after ‘Operation Midnight Hammer’ conducted by the US and Israel in 2025. According to the report, after this Iran made no effort to rebuild its Nuclear Enrichment Capability.

Read :- Statue of Trump and Epstein in Titanic pose installed in Washington DC, anonymous artist attacks US administration

Gabbard’s statement contrary to Trump’s claim, controversy raised in Senate

This conclusion is completely contrary to the claim of US President Donald Trump, in which he had said that Iran is rapidly rebuilding its nuclear program and can acquire nuclear weapons within a few weeks. On this basis, Trump started the war citing ‘immediate nuclear threat’. During the Senate hearing, Democratic leaders asked Gabbard why she did not repeat this important information in her oral statement. On this, Gabbard said that due to lack of time, some parts could not be read.

IAEA also statement

The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has also recently said that Iran is not currently in any active program to make nuclear weapons. He was in no position to make the bomb quickly.

Read :- Congress targeted Modi government, Jairam Ramesh said – US trade agreement is proof of ‘this time defeat by Trump’

America’s intelligence report raises big questions on the validity of Iran war

It has now been 20 days since the war. Tension has increased in the Strait of Hormuz. Crude oil prices have crossed $100. The effect of inflation is visible on many countries including India. America’s intelligence report has raised a big question on the legitimacy of the Iran war. Now the debate is on whether this war was due to real threat or a strategic and political decision or a strategy to change the regime.