Asaduddin Owaisi’s big statement on High Court’s decision on Bhojshala, said – ‘Supreme Court will correct this decision’

Indore bench of Madhya Pradesh High Court has given a major verdict in the Bhojshala-Maula Kamal Masjid dispute case located in Dhar. The court, in its order dated Friday, May 15, 2026, has said that the disputed site is basically a temple of Goddess Saraswati. The court also made it clear in its decision that historical and archaeological evidence also supports the same. Along with this important decision, the court has also suggested that Muslims can be provided alternative land at some other place for the mosque. After this decision of the High Court, a sharp reaction has come from All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) chief Asaduddin Owaisi.

Know what Asaduddin Owaisi said

Actually, Asaduddin Owaisi commented on this decision of Madhya Pradesh High Court and shared a post on social media platform X. In his post, he linked this decision to the court’s decision on Babri Masjid and said, ‘We hope that the Supreme Court of the country will correct this decision and overturn this order.’ Not only this, Owaisi further said, ‘There are clear similarities in this decision like the decision given on Babri Masjid.’ Owaisi has expressed his deep concern over this decision and termed it as contrary to the principles of justice.

Know what decision the court gave

Let us tell you here that the bench of Justice Vijay Kumar Shukla and Justice Alok Awasthi heard this case in Madhya Pradesh High Court. This bench rejected the old order, under which the Muslim party was allowed to offer namaz in the banquet hall. This decision marks a turning point in this long-running dispute.

It is noteworthy that in the year 2003, a system was made by the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI). According to this arrangement, followers of Hindu religion have been offering worship and namaz there on Tuesdays and people of Muslim community on Fridays. After this arrangement, the Hindu side filed a petition in the court. In this petition, the Hindu side had demanded the right to perform special puja in the premises. This latest decision of the High Court has come in the context of this petition.

Ayodhya case decision considered as basis of principles

The High Court has made it clear in its decision that its decision has been given on the basis of archaeological and historical evidence, ASI report and the principles laid down by the Supreme Court in the decision of the Ayodhya case. The court further said in its decision, ‘We have considered the ASI notifications and survey reports along with archaeological and historical evidence.’ The court also said that, ‘Based on the provisions of the ASI Act and the legal principles established in the Ayodhya case, this court can rely on the results of ASI’s research.’ Thus, the Court has strengthened the validity and basis of its decision, making it clear that the decision has been taken after careful deliberation and evaluation of the available evidence.