Ashoke Pandit breaks silence on Ranveer Singh ‘Don 3’ controversy: ‘No personal issue with Ranveer, don’t mix Dhurandhar’s success with Don 3 dispute’

Ashoke Pandit, President of IFTDA (Indian Film and Television Directors’ Association) and Chief Advisor of FWICE (Federation of Western India Cine Employees), has officially addressed the ongoing controversy surrounding Ranveer Singh’s exit from “Don 3”, making clear statements that the actor faces no personal issue and that Dhurandhar’s success should not be mixed with the contractual dispute.

Pandit’s Key Clarification: FWICE’s Action Is Not a Ban

Ashoke Pandit clarified that FWICE did not ban Ranveer Singh, but issued a “non-cooperation directive” against the actor. He explained: “Ranveer Singh is not banned, it’s a non-cooperation notice. The conversation went wrong” – emphasizing that the action was disciplinary, not a personal ban.

“No Personal Issue with Ranveer Singh”

In his statement, Pandit emphasized: “I have no personal issue with Ranveer Singh” – directly addressing rumors of personal conflict. He described Ranveer as a “talented actor” and stated that FWICE’s action is related to “professional commitment” rather than personal issues.

Pandit’s Warning: Don’t Mix Dhurandhar’s Success with Don 3 Dispute

The veteran filmmaker issued a strong warning against connecting “Dhurandhar’s success” with the “Don 3” controversy. He stated: “Don’t mix Dhurandhar’s success with Don 3, we’ve seen bigger stardom” – urging the industry to celebrate Dhurandhar’s success separately from the contractual dispute.

The Don 3 Controversy: ₹40 Crore Compensation Demand

The controversy began when Ranveer Singh exited Farhan Akhtar’s “Don 3” in 2025, with reports citing creative differences, delays, and script issues. Excel Entertainment reportedly claimed a ₹40 crore loss after Ranveer’s exit and demanded compensation from the actor. In a tense meeting, Ranveer accused Farhan of planning to replace him with Hrithik Roshan.

FWICE’s Action: Ranveer Didn’t Respond to Three Calls

Ashoke Pandit explained that FWICE tried to contact Ranveer Singh three times but received no response. He stated: “FWICE tried to contact Ranveer Singh three times, but got no answer” – indicating that the actor’s lack of communication led to the non-cooperation directive.

Reasons for Ranveer’s Exit: Creative Differences and Script Issues

Reports indicate that Ranveer Singh left “Don 3” due to creative differences, delays in the film, and script-related problems. The actor reportedly made the decision to exit the film in 2025, with the controversy becoming public amid ongoing reports about script disagreements and delays.

Dhurandhar: Ranveer’s Recent Success After Don 3 Exit

“Dhurandhar”, starring Ranveer Singh, has emerged as a major success following his exit from Don 3. The film has received positive audience response and achieved strong box office numbers, with some attempting to link its success to the Don 3 controversy, which Pandit has now firmly rejected.

Pandit Stands Firm on Professional Commitment

Pandit stressed that while contractual disputes must be addressed professionally, the success of Dhurandhar deserves recognition and celebration. He pointed out that Excel Entertainment signed Ranveer Singh long before the actor’s recent resurgence, emphasizing that professional commitments should be honored.

Pandit Slams Kangana Ranaut’s Comments on Ranveer

In a related development, Ashoke Pandit also criticized Kangana Ranaut for her comments supporting Ranveer Singh in the Don 3 controversy. He stated: “You’re talking nonsense, you’re making things up, that’s why we banned you” – referring to her previous ban by FWICE.

Industry Impact: Pandit’s Statement Brings Clarity

The veteran filmmaker’s statement has brought clarity to the industry, addressing confusion and speculation around the controversy. By separating Dhurandhar’s success from the Don 3 dispute and clarifying FWICE’s position on Ranveer, Pandit has helped move discussions toward professional and creative aspects rather than industry politics.