Big decision of Supreme Court in Bhojshala case, Friday prayers will not be held in the premises at present, court ready for hearing

Located in Dhar, Madhya Pradesh Bhojshala- Kamal Maula Masjid controversy The Supreme Court made an important comment on the matter on Tuesday. “sensitive issue” told. The court currently refused to restore Friday prayers in the Bhojshala premises, but agreed to hear the petition of the Muslim side.

The Supreme Court said that the case daily hearing This can be done so that this long standing dispute can be resolved quickly. The court also appealed to both the parties to maintain restraint.

At present Namaz is not allowed in the campus

Refusing to grant interim relief, a bench headed by the Chief Justice said that at present Friday prayers will not be allowed in the Bhojshala premises. However, the court Directed Madhya Pradesh Government to provide an open space near the campuswhere the Muslim community Can offer namaz every Friday from 1 pm to 3 pm.

Instructions given to ASI also

The Supreme Court also directed the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) not to carry out any kind of construction in the Bhojshala premises without the permission of the court. structural change Should not be done.

What is the whole matter?

The Muslim side has challenged in the Supreme Court the decision of the Madhya Pradesh High Court, in which May 2026 Bhojshala was declared a temple. The High Court had also canceled the 2003 order of ASI, under which Hindus were allowed to offer worship and namaz on Tuesday and Muslims on Friday.

The High Court had said in its decision that the available evidence indicates that Bhojshala was never Sanskrit Teaching Center and Temple of Maa Saraswati Was.

Different claims from both sides

The Hindu side claims that Bhojshala was built by Raja Bhoj. Mother Vagdevi (Saraswati) There is an ancient temple of. Whereas the Muslim side says that this complex has been there for centuries. Kamal Maula Masjid as has been in use and the right to offer prayers there should be restored.

Controversy over ASI survey also

On the instructions of the High Court, ASI had conducted a scientific survey for about 98 days in the year 2024. In the over 2,000-page report, the ASI claimed that before the present structure, a huge temple-like structure dating back to the Parmar rulers existed there and later the present structure was built using the remains of the temple.

However, the Muslim side presented the ASI report in the court. biased Questions have been raised on his impartiality.

At present, the Supreme Court has indicated a detailed hearing of the case. In such a situation, now everyone’s eyes are fixed on the upcoming hearing and final decision.