Crypto Exchanges vs Banks: Why did the fight between crypto exchanges and banks break out, know the whole story?
Business Desk – Crypto Exchanges vs Banks: A major crypto exchange of America is Coinbase Global Inc. He told that an important provision related to stablecoin yield has been agreed upon. This development may pave the way for advancing crypto legislation in the US Senate.
The legislation stalled earlier this year because of a dispute over whether crypto exchanges should be allowed to reward customers for holding stablecoins. Banks had strongly advocated a ban on such rewards. His argument was that with this, money could be withdrawn on a large scale from traditional banking institutions.
Crypto exchange vs bank, what was the agreement?
Faryar Shirzad, chief policy officer at Coinbase, explained that even though banks ultimately succeeded in imposing tighter restrictions on rewards, crypto exchanges missed the mark on what really matters. The ability for Americans to earn rewards based on the actual utility of crypto platforms and networks. Shirzad shared these things on X (earlier Twitter).
After this consent, this law which deals with the structural form of the crypto market. Now it can be taken forward for voting in the Senate Banking Committee. The purpose of this bill is to clarify the regulatory authority of the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission over different parts of the digital asset ecosystem.
The bill was stuck in January
Earlier this year, a crypto bill named “Clarity Act” was introduced. An attempt was made to present it for voting. However, that effort failed, as Coinbase’s CEO at the time, Brian Armstrong, publicly announced that his company would not support the proposal.
Since then, the White House has been trying to broker an agreement between banks and crypto companies. It is not yet clear that all the industry’s concerns have been completely resolved. However, Shirzad said on Friday that a lot of progress has been made on many fronts. Armstrong has urged to take this process forward.
Comments are closed.