Earlier, the court had strongly pulled up the Additional Solicitor General. He had argued that the stringent bail conditions applied to women also.

Independent Morning.

Supreme court by Wednesday To Said That He Center Government of side From Law Of Adverse Gave Went legal pleas To tolerate No Will do. supreme court by it hard Comment enforcement directorate Of This logic To to deny Of after of Is That PMLA of Stream 45 Of provisions Any Woman But Applicable No will be. justice Abbey S Oka And justice bright Bhuinya of bench by Said‘union off India By Law Of Adverse Gave Went arguments to give Of Behaviour To tolerate No do.

From this First court by additional Solicitor general of fiercely pulled up of Was. They logic Gave Was That link surety terms women But Too Applicable was Are. Then court by told Was That Stream 45 Of provisions In surety Of For women To Two conditions From Clean manner But Discount Gave Went Is. Today cases In present happened Solicitor general Frost Mehta by Ed of Side From First of Went plea Of For beginning In Forgiveness Asked for. Frost Mehta by Said That previous plea Miss communication of Reason From Hui Was.

justice Oka by Said‘Miss communication Of Any Question No Is. We union off India of This Kind of pleas of Sometimes Appreciate No do.’ This talk To repeating happened That He Forgiveness Demand are Are, sg by answer filed to do Of For moratorium Asked for. it say happened That accused Woman criminal activities of kingpin Was And Only Woman to be Of Base But Him surety No to meet Needed

justice Oka by Said That If Center of Side From present to be ones People Law Of basic provisions To No Know Are, So Them This cases In Why present Happen Needed And 11th hours In answer filed to do it shows Is That it Last Is That PMLA Of under arrested did Went Person To Any Too situation In surety to give From denied Did Go Needed

official School of teacher Shashi Bala But shine City group off companies To crime of Income To to rob In Help to do Of Blame Is. Ed Of allegations Of According to, He company Of direct Rasheed Naseem Of trusted Of manner But Work Did And Fraud the one plans Of through investors To swindler Tax illegal Exchange In Help of. Allahabad Hi court by First allegations of seriousness And crime of Income To hide And His use to do In His alleged Involvement To watching happened His surety petition rejected Tax Gave Was. so He Supreme court Of Door knocked out Was.