From Robo Dog to Drone Soccer, Ruckus, Claims, Video and Apology created an uproar at AI Summit

A robo dog is displayed at the stall of Galgotias University during the AI ​​Impact Summit at Bharat Mandapam, New Delhi. The cameras arrived and the representative claimed that it was developed at the University’s Center of Excellence. This statement became the beginning of the entire controversy. The technical exhibition suddenly became a matter of debate. Questions began to arise whether this claim was completely true.

Did social media change the picture in a matter of hours?

As soon as the video of the robo dog surfaced, comparisons started on social media. Users pointed out the similarity of its structure and design with a Chinese-made model. Links were shared and it was said that this product is already present in the market. Allegations were made that foreign models were presented as our own. Within a few hours the stall became the center of discussion.

Was there a mistake in explaining the difference between ‘develop’ and ‘build’?

While talking to the media, the professor said that the robot is not being built but is being developed. He told that researching a platform and building it completely yourself are different things. But the message sent on the camera was not clear. People felt that the university had created it entirely on its own. This ambiguity of words deepened the controversy.

Did the university finally have to apologize?

After the growing controversy, Galgotias University issued a statement on the matter and apologized. It was said that the representative present at the stall had not received the technical information properly. He was not even allowed to talk to the media. The university clarified that its intention was not to misrepresent. Also told that he has vacated his stall from the summit.

After Robo Dog, has drone soccer opened a new frontier?

The issue of robo dog had not even cooled down when the video of drone soccer went viral. In the video, the professor was seen claiming that the end-to-end engineering of the drone has been done in the university. He talked about having India’s first drone soccer arena on the campus. This claim also came under scrutiny on social media.

Did the comparison with the Korean model add to the controversy?

Some users compared this drone with the model of South Korean company Helsel. It was said that the drone shown in the video is the same Stryker V3 ARF. Even the price and features were counted. Indian Youth Congress also commented on this. It was alleged that foreign technology was presented as Indian innovation.

Has this whole issue raised a big question on trust?

This dispute was not just about a robot or drone. It became a question of academic honesty and transparency. In the age of technology, every claim is tested immediately. If one is not careful in words, the reputation of the institution may be at stake. The purpose of the AI ​​Summit was to showcase technical capabilities, but this incident brought to the fore the importance of trust.