Supreme Court Hearing On Sarkari Naukri: The Supreme Court has given a big and historic decision regarding the rules of government jobs. The Supreme Court has banned arbitrarily changing the rules of government jobs. The court clearly said that there will be no change in the rules after the government job process starts. The country's top court has given this decision in the case appointed in Rajasthan High Court.
Indians made a splash in the US Presidential elections, hoisted the flag of victory across the seven seas, you will also be proud after seeing the list – Indian Origin Candidates Victory List
However, the Supreme Court has said that if the rules earlier state that the eligibility for a job can be changed, then it can be done. But this cannot happen arbitrarily by violating the right to equality.
Lal Kitab: Ruckus over Rahul Gandhi's 'Lal Kitab', what is inside the book distributed in Nagpur rally that caused uproar
The question before the Constitution bench of five judges was whether the rules could be changed after the recruitment process started or not. SC also said in its decision that the process of recruitment to government posts should be completely transparent and fair.
Donald Trump is my father… Pakistani Muslim girl's claim created sensation, said – 'Trump is my father, he married my mother…'
Know what is the whole matter
Actually, this matter is related to appointment in Rajasthan High Court. Is. The candidates had to participate in a written examination. After that, the successful candidates in the written examination had to appear for interview. 21 candidates appeared in the exam. Only three of them were declared successful by the High Court (administrative side). Later it came to light that the Chief Justice of the High Court had ordered that only candidates scoring at least 75 percent marks should be selected for these posts.
Elon Musk & Donald Trump: 'Pair of two boys' did wonders in America, Elon Musk remained like a shadow with Donald Trump throughout the election, X's boss spent money like water
The 75 per cent qualifying rule was not mentioned in this recruitment process when the recruitment process was first notified by the High Court. Moreover, only by applying this revised criteria, three candidates were selected and the remaining candidates were excluded. The three unsuccessful candidates challenged this result by filing a writ petition before the High Court, which was dismissed in March 2010.
Uproar in Jammu and Kashmir Assembly over Article 370, scuffle between MLAs of party and opposition, posters torn – Jammu & Kashmir Assembly Ruckus Video
Petition filed in Supreme Court
Due to new rules being made in the middle of this recruitment in 2009, many candidates were deprived of getting jobs. 3 candidates had challenged this in the High Court. He said that once the process starts, the rules cannot be changed. His petition was rejected in 2010. After this, in 2013, a three-judge bench of the Supreme Court sent the case to a five-judge constitution bench. This year, a five-judge bench headed by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud heard the case.
Investigation into Rahul Gandhi's British citizenship begins, know which BJP leader had filed the PIL…
In its decision, the Supreme Court said that the recruitment process starts with the issuance of application forms and ends with filling the posts. The rules of eligibility cannot be changed midway, if such change is made midway in the rules and advertisement, then it is necessary to meet the criteria of Article 14. Getting a place in the selection list does not confer any right on the post.
Mani Shankar Aiyar was saddened when Donald Trump became President, said – 'A man of such character who is with prostitutes…', – Mani Shankar Aiyar
Don't forget to follow Read.Com's WhatsApp channel.
Comments are closed.