Gurugram Rape Case: Supreme Court strict on the investigation of Haryana Police, expressed deep displeasure over the methods of investigation.

News India Live, Digital Desk: The Supreme Court of the country has shown strict stance on the functioning of Haryana Police in a famous rape case of Gurugram. A bench of Justice Abhay S Oka and Justice Augustine George Masih has raised serious questions over the lax action of the Special Investigation Team (SIT) formed to investigate the case. The court clearly said that the way this sensitive matter was handled is extremely disappointing. Considering the seriousness of the matter, this case has now sparked a new debate on law and order and police working style. Court’s sharp questions on SIT’s investigation. During the hearing, the Supreme Court termed the progress report of the SIT prepared by the Haryana Police as inadequate. The bench expressed surprise as to why the pace of investigation is so slow despite such a serious crime. Commenting on the investigation methods of the police, the court said that it appears that the investigation is limited to papers only. Expressing displeasure, the Supreme Court has sought answers from the Haryana Government and the Director General of Police as to why there is so much delay in arresting the accused and gathering evidence. Concerned over the delay in getting justice to the victim. In this case, the Court stressed on the safety of the victim and her right to get timely justice. This heinous crime, which took place in a high-profile city like Gurugram, has raised a question mark on the safety of women. The Supreme Court said that if the investigating agencies work like this, the general public may lose confidence in the justice system. The court has directed that till the next hearing of the case, the police will have to submit a concrete and detailed status report, which mentions the effective action taken so far. This strictness of the Supreme Court in the Gurugram rape case is a big message for the police administration. Experts believe that on the pretext of this case, the court can now monitor the formation of SITs in the states and their efficiency. The victim’s side had also accused the police of not cooperating and trying to suppress the case before the court. Now all eyes are on the next hearing, where the police will have to prove its impartiality.