Haryana: Haryana Police personnel got a big shock, High Court gave this decision

Haryana News: Punjab and Haryana High Court Some of the Haryana Police Department employees By Old pension Plan ,OPS) Of For fixed cut-off date To challenge to give the one petition To dismissed Tax Gave Is, court Of This decisions From petitioner Police personnel To Shock Put Iswhereas the state government has got a big relief.

petitioners by High Court From 8 May 2023 of notification To Cancelled to do of Demand of Was, their logic Was That OPS Of For cut-off date 18 august 2008 to be NeededNo That 28 october 2005. Although, court by Government Of decisions To Correct accommodate happened petition dismissed Tax Gave,

What Was Police personnel of plea

petitioner Police personnel by told That They 3 May 2006 To Ongoing Advertisement Of Base But constable Post Of For Application Did Was, Application of Last date 24 May 2006 Was, They selection Process Of All phase successfully the whole did And finally in 2007 Appointment Letter Were issued.

Police personnel Said that by the time he applied, the new pension Plan ,NPS) The situation was not clear, so they OPS Should get the benefit.

the government has rules When and how was the change made?

Following the rules of the Central Government, the State Government has october Notification was issued in 2005. Through this notification, Rule 1.2 of the Punjab Civil Service Rules (applicable to Haryana) was amended.

This amendment, issued under Article 309 of the Constitution, clarified that all government employees appointed on or after January 1, 2006, will be eligible for the New Defined Contribution Pension Scheme (NDPS).NPS) Will come under.

NPS It took two years to implement

Told the court on behalf of the government Went That NPS Of draft Ready It took about two years to do. After this, a notification was issued on 18 August 2008. NPS was formally implemented. Although, Notification It was clearly mentioned that this scheme will be considered effective from January 1, 2006.

The state government had abolished the old pension scheme in accordance with the policy of the Central Government.

The lawyer appearing for the state government argued that this Case It is completely related to policy decisions. The settled principle of law is that courts generally do not interfere in policy matters unless there is a constitutional or legal violation.

Comments are closed.