Nitish Kumar hijab controversy: If we do it then it is leela and if they do then the character is loose. The matter is serious… in a state where recent elections have been held, but the Chief Minister is a little old. If he is old then he must be gold… but now he has also become bold for some time. It was a matter of will. one was forced hijab One was to pull it and the other was to wear it. For the wearer, it is a symbol of decency and respect and for the person pulling it, it just seems like fun (at least this is what is reflected in the video). There is an uproar. Not only in India, but also in those countries with which we are building bridges of diplomatic friendship.
Read now on WhatsApp also, click to subscribe
The bottleneck continues in the blinding fog environment. They constitute 15 percent of India’s population. About 22 crore Muslims live here…saying this, the media institutions of Arab countries are bent on scandal. Some are calling it an attack on dignity while others are showing their dominance over the weak. Some are together and some are later. Someone’s temperature is increasing and someone’s value is increasing. someone says’screw you man‘ Then someone says ‘in heaven’. But why tamper with the symbol of one’s personal faith, identity and culture?
‘There must be something going on otherwise no one would be unfaithful just like that’
If pulling hijab is not wrong or hurtful, then did the Home Minister standing behind Honorable Nitish Kumar just reach out to stop him? There must be something going on otherwise no one would be unfaithful just like that. While the rest of the honorable people standing there were busy giving their humorous approval on this… and now their commanders are busy glorifying this action of theirs. Why? If this was true then Samrat Chaudhary’s hand would not have moved to stop Nitish Kumar. Why so much hesitation in calling right right and wrong wrong?
Now why did the strongman remain silent?
If the opposition is engaged in revolution then the parties are at peace. Now the same party has started defending itself, which three years ago had thrown out one of its leaders for making a comment against the Prophet. When he had left no stone unturned in painting the dented image outside the house, then why did Balwana remain silent now? This public behavior of those who have tasted power by relying on women is not justified. If there is objection to someone’s attire then it should be banned. As some countries like Norway, Netherlands, France and Austria have done.
Should there be such a dispute over clothes?
Even though Baba Saheb Ambedkar may have said that it is not comfortable to see someone wearing hijab on the streets of India, it is horrifying… but is it justified to behave like this with someone in public? Those who know Nitish Kumar personally believe that such public behavior on his part is far away from his politics. Of course there is no doubt about their intentions but should there be such a dispute over clothes? No doubt he started many schemes for women but why such behavior on dress?
Don’t give me a chance to stick out my neck like an ostrich
If something had to be said or advice given, couldn’t there have been more civilized and decent ways of putting it? There were thousands of such ways – with harmony and dignity. If empowerment is truly the intention, then there should be an open and honest discussion on banning it at the state level. Denmark is also moving towards banning it in educational institutions, but for the time being, the trend of demonizing religion should stop here. Let those people who spread hatred remain in hell. Don’t give them a chance to puff out their neck like an ostrich.
cultured in any respect
The game of imposing and removing bans will continue. One should avoid getting entangled in the debate whether the AYUSH student wore hijab in college or not. It is futile to even speculate intellectually on whether she talked to anyone or not. There is no need for anyone to speculate on whether he should join or reject the job. The point is simply that Lakshman Rekha should not be crossed. The practice of purdah should be completely eradicated from this country and this society, but this behavior of the honorable people cannot be called cultured in any respect.
Comments are closed.