BJP scripted speeches with the help of WhatsApp: Silence on EVM and real questions? Opposition attack on Shah’s address

Rahul Gandhi vs Amit Shah on SIR: After the speech of Union Home Minister Amit Shah in the Lok Sabha, the political temperature has reached sky high. Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi described Shah’s entire address as ‘defensive’ Agreed and rejected. He said in clear words that the government has now come into defensive mode. Coming out of the House after Shah’s counterattack, Rahul alleged that the Home Minister has maintained mysterious silence on the most important and burning questions like the architecture of EVMs and transparent voter list, which has further deepened the suspicion.

Congress has described the Home Minister’s reply as completely scripted and based on WhatsApp history. Gaurav Gogoi taunted that Shah was only reading a rote script and did not give direct answers to any concrete question of the opposition. At the same time, Manish Tiwari, playing a legal gamble, termed the process of SIR as unconstitutional. The opposition says that when the government ‘crosses 400’ When she was giving the slogan, she did not find any flaw in the voter list, but now due to the fear of defeat, new stories are being created.

WhatsApp knowledge and rote scripts?

Gaurav Gogoi launched a scathing attack on Amit Shah and said that BJP is running on the basis of WhatsApp history. He alleged that Shah deliberately ignored the issues raised by leaders like Rahul Gandhi, Akhilesh Yadav and Supriya Sule. Rahul Gandhi also told the media after walking out of the House that he demanded the removal of the CJI from the appointment of election commissioners and the complete immunity given to the Election Commission. Questions were raised, but the Home Minister did not utter a single word on them. Rahul said that we are not afraid and the country is understanding the meaning of this silence of the government.

Also read: Nehru’s 2 votes outweigh Patel’s 28 votes? Amit Shah narrated the unheard story of ‘vote theft’ in Parliament.

In which book of the Constitution is this rule written?

Congress MP Manish Tiwari gave a new turn to the debate and raised constitutional questions. He asked, where did the Election Commission get the right to conduct Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in the entire country? Tiwari argued that Articles 324 and 347 of the Constitution do not give any such power to the Commission. The opposition clearly believes that the Home Minister has tried to avoid today’s serious questions by resorting to technical arguments and old history. Overall, the opposition has described Shah’s speech as a distraction from the issues.