Delhi Delhi. The Samsung Galaxy S25 and Galaxy S25 Plus may not use Qualcomm or Exynos, as the company may opt for MediaTek's flagship chips. A new report claims that Samsung's next year's flagship phones will feature Dimensity 9400 chipsets in standard and Plus models, which should deliver significant performance and efficiency improvements compared to the Exynos chipset.
The speculation that Samsung is leaning toward MediaTek chipsets for the next Galaxy S series phones comes from Google, which published a statement on September 26 detailing how its DeepMind technology is helping chipmakers achieve better performance on a variety of devices. And helping in providing productivity.
The statement reads: External organizations are also adopting and building on Alphachip. For example, MediaTek, one of the world's top chip design companies, expanded Alphachip to accelerate the development of its most advanced chips – such as the Dimensity flagship 5G used in Samsung mobile phones – while reducing the power, performance and There has been improvement in the area.
This part hints that MediaTek's next flagship processor is coming to Samsung and will be used right on the company's flagship phones. Samsung has never used a top-end MediaTek processor on a phone before, although its Galaxy Tab S10 series tablets are based on the Dimensity 9300+ SoC. And if DeepMind's statement holds any truth, the Dimensity 9400 will replace the Exynos, which replaced the Snapdragon last year. This means better performance, efficiency, and support for AI tools, as Galaxy S24 users have complained about inconsistent performance from Samsung's in-house processor.
But MediaTek chipsets will likely be available on the Galaxy S25 and Galaxy S25 Plus. On the other hand, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra may come with the upcoming Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset, just like its predecessor. Samsung launched the Galaxy S24 Ultra in January with Qualcomm's top-end Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset, while the other two phones in the series came with Exynos processors.
Comments are closed.