By excluding YouTuber Ravindra Balu Bharti and his business, Ravindra Bharti Education Institute, from the securities market until April 4, 2025, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has sent a stern message to unregistered investment advisors and financial influencers. This historic move underscores the need of investor awareness and the dangers of relying on unlicensed financial advice.
Credits: Business Standard
The Case Against Ravindra Balu Bharti
Ravindra Balu Bharti, a financial influencer with significant reach through two YouTube channels boasting 10.8 lakh and 8.33 lakh subscribers, leveraged his online presence to promote his investment advisory services. SEBI’s investigation revealed that Ravindra Bharti Education Institute engaged in unregistered investment advisory activities, luring inexperienced investors with promises of high returns.
Operating through its premises and employees, the company marketed services that included trade recommendations and execution assistance, presenting an illusion of expertise. However, SEBI noted that these operations were unregistered and violated multiple regulations, including fiduciary duties and Investment Adviser (IA) norms.
Unlawful Gains and Violations
According to SEBI’s findings, the company generated unlawful gains of ₹9.49 crore by selling multiple investment plans to clients and limiting their input in trading decisions. Investors were not adequately informed about the associated risks or the incomplete financial disclosures in agreements, making these practices misleading and deceptive.
The regulator observed that the company’s promises of high returns were based on the credentials of Ravindra Bharti, but the reality was far from the claims. Clients were often left in the dark about the true risks involved, violating their trust and the foundational principles of investment advisory.
SEBI’s Directives
In its final order, SEBI has:
Disgorgement of Unlawful Gains: Directed Ravindra Bharti and his company to disgorge ₹9.49 crore, along with simple interest at 6%.
In Market: Prohibited Ravindra Bharti Education Institute and its associates, including Shubhangi Ravindra Bharti, Rahul Ananta Gosavi, and Dhanashri Chandrakant Giri, from accessing the securities market or dealing in securities until April 4, 2025.
Enforcement of Compliance: Restricted these entities from buying, selling, or engaging with the securities market directly or indirectly.
These stringent measures aim to safeguard investors and deter others from engaging in similar practices.
The Role of Financial Influencers
The rise of social media platforms has brought a wave of financial influencers offering advice to millions of followers. While this democratization of financial education can be beneficial, it also comes with risks. Many influencers, like Ravindra Bharti, operate without proper registration or regulation, making their advice potentially harmful.
The case underscores the dangers of relying solely on online personalities for financial decisions. Investors must ensure that their advisors are SEBI-registered and capable of providing transparent and regulated services.
Lessons for Investors
This episode serves as a cautionary tale for retail investors. To avoid falling prey to such schemes, consider these best practices:
Verify Credentials: Always check if an investment advisor is registered with SEBI.
Understand Risks: Ensure that you are fully informed about the risks involved in any investment.
Read Agreements Carefully: Review all financial agreements for transparency and completeness.
Be Skeptical of High Returns: Promises of guaranteed or exceptionally high returns should raise red flags.
Credits: CNBCTV 18
Broader Implications
SEBI’s action sends a clear message to financial influencers and companies engaging in unregistered advisory services: non-compliance will not be tolerated. It also reinforces the regulator’s commitment to protecting retail investors in a rapidly evolving financial landscape.
The crackdown is likely to prompt other financial influencers to either register with SEBI or reconsider their operations. For investors, it is a timely reminder to prioritize safety and diligence over convenience and quick profits.
Conclusion
Strong regulatory monitoring and investor attention are essential, as demonstrated by the SEBI decision against Ravindra Balu Bharti and his associates. Ensuring adherence to established standards will be essential to preserving integrity and trust in the market as the financial advising industry expands online. The maxim for individual investors is still the same: have faith but double-check.
Comments are closed.