Stockton Rush Allegedly Said He Would “Buy a Congressman”

In a stunning testimony, a former OceanGate employee has claimed that Stockton Rush, the CEO of the company behind the ill-fated Titan submersible, once suggested he would “buy a congressman” to resolve regulatory issues related to the submarine’s expeditions. The allegation, made by Matthew McCoy, a Coast Guard veteran, sheds new light on the controversial practices within OceanGate and Rush’s approach to circumventing safety regulations.

Shocking Testimony from Former Employee

During a recent hearing, McCoy testified that in 2017, Rush made the startling comment to him while discussing regulatory hurdles OceanGate was facing concerning its Titan submersible. According to McCoy, Rush was frustrated with the Coast Guard’s attempts to halt OceanGate’s operations in California and made the brazen suggestion to “buy a congressman” to make these problems “go away.”

McCoy, clearly disturbed by the exchange, said the conversation marked a turning point in his time at OceanGate. “That will stand in my mind for the rest of time,” McCoy told the hearing. “I’ve never had anybody say that to me directly, and I was aghast and, basically, after that, I resigned from the company.” McCoy’s resignation followed shortly after this conversation, and his testimony highlights a toxic culture within OceanGate that allegedly disregarded safety and regulatory oversight in favor of expeditions with the Titan submersible.

OceanGate’s Troubling Culture and Safety Concerns

McCoy’s testimony also painted a grim picture of OceanGate’s internal culture and lack of adherence to safety protocols. He alleged that the company had no formal system in place for addressing employee complaints or concerns, which included matters of safety. Furthermore, McCoy revealed that OceanGate did not plan to certify or register the Titan submersible, a glaring omission given the vessel’s high-risk missions to the depths of the ocean.

McCoy went on to suggest that OceanGate’s team lacked professional engineers or safety officers, raising further questions about the company’s commitment to passenger safety. His testimony echoes concerns raised by other former employees who have criticized the company’s focus on commercial success at the expense of safety standards.

The Fatal Titan Sub Implosion

The most tragic consequence of OceanGate’s alleged safety lapses came in June 2023, when the Titan submersible suffered a catastrophic implosion during a deep-sea expedition to the wreck of the Titanic. The disaster claimed the lives of all five people on board, including Stockton Rush himself, along with British billionaire Hamish Harding, French diver Paul Henry Nargeolet, and Pakistani businessman Shahzada Dawood and his son Suleman.

The implosion has brought intense scrutiny to OceanGate and its operations, with critics accusing the company of cutting corners on safety in pursuit of profit. McCoy’s testimony has added fuel to these criticisms, as it suggests that Rush was not only aware of the potential dangers but was also willing to engage in unethical practices to continue his expeditions.

McCoy’s account of Stockton Rush’s leadership further highlights concerns about his temperament and decision-making. According to McCoy, Rush had a “concerning” personality and was known for becoming defensive when faced with challenges or criticisms. This defensive attitude, McCoy claimed, contributed to a work environment where employees were hesitant to raise safety concerns or question the company’s operations.

The allegations surrounding Rush’s leadership are corroborated by other former OceanGate employees. David Lochridge, the company’s former Director of Operations, also testified about his frequent clashes with Rush. Lochridge claimed that Rush was more concerned with profit than safety, stating, “The whole idea behind the company was to make money. There was very little in the way of science.” Lochridge’s testimony underscores the troubling corporate culture at OceanGate, where financial motivations seemingly took precedence over the safety of passengers and crew.

In another bombshell revelation, Karl Stanley, a longtime friend of Stockton Rush, suggested that Rush was aware of the risks he was taking. Stanley, who knew Rush personally, claimed that the CEO was driven by a desire to follow in the adventurous footsteps of his ancestors but was also aware that his expeditions could end in disaster. “(Rush) knew that eventually it was going to end like this, and he wasn’t going to be held accountable,” Stanley said.

Stanley’s remarks indicate that Rush may have been willing to accept the eventual catastrophic outcome, raising serious ethical concerns about his leadership. The fact that Rush seemingly predicted the Titan’s disastrous fate, yet continued with his high-risk expeditions, points to a troubling disregard for the safety of both his crew and passengers.

The Titan submersible disaster has left a dark mark on OceanGate’s legacy, and the revelations from former employees like McCoy and Lochridge only serve to deepen the controversy. Their testimonies suggest that OceanGate’s failure was not merely a technical or operational misstep but rather a systemic issue stemming from a corporate culture that prioritized profit over safety.

The allegations that Stockton Rush was willing to “buy a congressman” to avoid regulatory scrutiny further compound the ethical questions surrounding OceanGate’s operations. It suggests that the company was not only cutting corners in terms of engineering and safety but was also willing to engage in potentially corrupt practices to keep its expeditions running.

The testimonies of former employees like Matthew McCoy and David Lochridge have provided a window into the troubling corporate culture at OceanGate. Their claims, combined with the tragic loss of life in the Titan submersible implosion, raise serious questions about Stockton Rush’s leadership and the company’s approach to safety. As more details emerge, OceanGate’s legacy may be forever tainted by its willingness to take extreme risks, both ethical and operational, in its pursuit of adventure and profit.

Comments are closed.