The cricketing landscape in India is always abuzz with emerging talent, and the recent inclusion of Tanush Kotian in the Indian squad for the Border Gavaskar Trophy is a testament to the depth of cricketing prowess in the country. This selection raises an interesting comparison with another young all-rounder, Washington Sundar, particularly in their First-Class cricket statistics. Here, we undertake a detailed analysis to discern who between Tanush Kotian and Washington Sundar holds the statistical upper hand in the longer format of the game.
Tanush Kotian, the Mumbai off-spinner, has made waves with his consistent performances in domestic cricket. His addition to the Indian squad for the high-stakes series against Australia is a clear indicator of his potential. On the other hand, Washington Sundar, already an established name in Indian cricket, has shown his mettle in both domestic and international arenas, particularly with his off-spin and left-handed batting.
Tanush Kotian has played 33 First-Class matches, participating in 59 innings. Washington Sundar, slightly ahead in experience, has played 34 matches with 58 innings. Both players have had ample opportunities to showcase their skills, but there’s a slight edge to Sundar in terms of matches played.
Bowling Statistics –
In terms of balls bowled, Tanush Kotian leads with 4,694 deliveries compared to Sundar’s 4,540. However, the effectiveness of their bowling can be better gauged through other metrics:
Wickets: Tanush Kotian has captured 101 wickets, surpassing Sundar’s 83 wickets. This gives Kotian an edge in terms of sheer wicket-taking ability in First-Class cricket.
Best Bowling Figures: Sundar has the better single innings performance with 7/59, while Kotian’s best is 5/58. However, Kotian has a slightly better match figure with 9/122 compared to Washington Sundar’s 11/115, showing his consistency over two innings.
Average: Kotian’s average of 25.70 is better than Sundar’s 26.74, indicating that Kotian has been a tad more economical in terms of runs conceded per wicket.
Economy Rate: Sundar bowls at a more economical rate of 2.93 runs per over compared to Kotian’s 3.31. This suggests Sundar controls the game’s tempo better, keeping the run flow in check.
Strike Rate: Tanush Kotian has a better strike rate of one wicket every 46.4 balls compared to Sundar’s 54.6, showing Kotian’s ability to take wickets more frequently.
Five-Wicket and Ten-Wicket Hauls: Sundar has four 5-wicket hauls in an innings and two match 10-wicket hauls, slightly better than Kotian’s three 5-wicket hauls and no 10-wicket match hauls. This indicates Sundar’s capability to dominate innings or matches single-handedly on occasion.
While both are primarily recognized for their bowling, their contributions with the bat cannot be overlooked:
Tanush Kotian has made a name for himself as a lower-order batsman capable of scoring crucial runs. His First-Class average and strike rate would give more context, but these details are not provided here. His role in Mumbai’s batting lineup often involves stabilizing or accelerating the innings.
Washington Sundar has shown he can be a handy batsman, particularly in Test cricket where he has scored significant runs under pressure, including his famous 62 on debut against Australia. His ability to bat in the top order or lower down adds versatility to his game.
Both players have primarily played on Indian pitches, which are known to assist spinners. However, Sundar has also had international experience, which might have exposed him to a wider variety of conditions. Kotian’s performances have been largely on Mumbai’s pitches, which are conducive to spin but also test one’s technique and patience due to the quality of opposition.
Kotian’s addition to the Indian Test squad was based on his recent performances in domestic cricket, where he has been pivotal for Mumbai. His knack for taking wickets and contributing with the bat has been crucial in several matches. Sundar, on the other hand, has had his share of limelight with Tamil Nadu, showcasing his all-round abilities, particularly in the Ranji Trophy.
Consistency vs. Peaks: Kotian shows a higher consistency in taking wickets, as evidenced by his better average and strike rate. Sundar, however, has shown peaks where he has been unplayable, as seen with his best bowling figures.
Role Flexibility: Both players offer flexibility in team composition, but Sundar’s international experience and left-handed batting give him an edge in versatility, especially in an international context.
Future Prospects: Kotian is at the threshold of international cricket, with his selection for the Border Gavaskar Trophy indicating high expectations. Sundar, having already tasted international cricket, faces the challenge of reclaiming his spot in the Test team.
While numbers provide a clear picture, cricket is not just about statistics but also about temperament, adaptability, and crucial moments. Tanush Kotian has shown a slight statistical superiority in First-Class cricket, particularly in wicket-taking and consistency. However, Washington Sundar’s experience in international cricket, his match-winning performances, and his versatility with the bat versus left-handed opposition cannot be understated.
As Tanush Kotian steps into the international arena, his performance will be closely watched, not just in comparison to Sundar but also in how he fits into the grander scheme of Indian cricket. With the Border Gavaskar Trophy on the line, Kotian’s opportunity to prove his mettle against Australia could very well define his career trajectory, potentially setting the stage for a healthy rivalry with established players like Sundar in the quest to be India’s next spin sensation.
Comments are closed.