The name is big and the vision is small! In Safety Test, this car got zero rating, the company lost sleep

  • Safety test of Hyundai i10 done
  • It got zero rating in GNCAP safety test
  • The company’s tension increased

Nowadays, customers pay special attention to the safety features while buying a car. Considering this demand of the customers, many auto companies are incorporating better and advanced safety features in their cars. Also, many cars undergo their safety test, which gives them a safety rating. One such car underwent a safety test and the result gave the company sleepless nights.

Made in India Hyundai The Grand i10 has received a 0-star safety rating from the Global New Car Assessment Program (GNCAP). This rating is specifically for the model sold in South Africa, but the report caught everyone’s attention as the design of the car is largely the same in India. Let’s know the crash test results of Hyundai Grand i10 conducted by Global New Car Assessment Program (GNCAP).

Royal Enfield Classic 350 vs Harley-Davidson X440 T, which bike is better? find out

Hyundai Grand i10 Safety Rating

The Hyundai Grand i10 scored 0/34 in adult occupant protection. Child passenger protection scored 28.57/49. The frontal impact test of the Hyundai Grand i10 showed the company thought-provoking results in the frontal crash test (64 km/h). Moreover, better head and neck protection was observed. Head and neck protection for driver and passengers is adequate.

Knee protection

The knees of the driver and passengers received limited protection. Regarding leg protection, the right leg (tibia) received good protection, while the left leg received adequate protection.

2 Lakhs Down Payment and Direct Home Delivery of New Kore Tata Sierra, Know EMI?

Footwell and bodyshell safety

GNCAP has declared the car’s footwell and entire bodyshell as unstable, meaning it is unable to withstand additional loads in an accident. This is considered the most critical aspect for any car.

Side Impact Test

The car failed the side impact test. The side crash test did not fare well. However, head and pelvis protection was found to be good. Abdominal protection was good, but chest protection was completely nil. Furthermore, the side pole test was not conducted due to the vehicle’s lack of side head protection (such as side airbags).

Comments are closed.