Twisha Sharma Case: ‘A divorced daughter is always better than a dead daughter’; Important Comment by Tushar Mehta on Twisha Sharma Death Case

• Twisha Sharma death case hearing in Supreme Court
• Solicitor General Tushar Mehta – Solicitor General Tushar Mehta
• Giribala Singh tried to defame his daughter-in-law by giving interviews on TV channel – Solicitor General Tushar Mehta

Twisha Sharma Case: Twisha Sharma, a 33-year-old corporate businessman and actress from Madhya Pradesh, died on May 12. Twisha was found hanged at her father-in-law’s house in Bhopal’s Katara Hills area. Following this, Twisha’s family leveled several allegations against her in-laws, claiming that they were responsible for her death. The Supreme Court has taken serious note of this sensitive matter related to Twisha Sharma and has taken suo motu notice.

The case was heard in the Supreme Court today (May 25). During this hearing, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta said, “A divorced daughter is always better than a dead daughter.” Also, the family should have taken timely action regarding Twisha’s complaints against her in-laws. He also expressed his displeasure saying that.

Delhi Airport : Cyber ​​threat bell at Delhi Airport! 18 flights affected, GPS spoofing hits airports

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta on behalf of Madhya Pradesh Government, Chief Justice Suryakant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi and Justice Vipul M. The case was heard before the bench of Panchauli, while senior advocate Siddharth Dave represented the accused family.

According to ‘Live Law’, Twisha’s mother-in-law and former district judge Giribala Singh had accused Twisha by making some claims on TV channels. “Giribala Singh is trying to defame his daughter-in-law by giving interviews on this TV channel and is not cooperating with the investigation,” it added.
When Siddharth Dave expressed displeasure over media reports and said that the entire statement recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) was published in today’s newspaper, Solicitor General (SG) Tushar Mehta said, “And Twisha’s mother-in-law Giribala Singh, is giving interviews on various channels and making defamatory statements about her daughter-in-law.”

MLC Election 2026: What is the Grand Alliance’s seat allocation formula for Legislative Council? A tug-of-war from BJP for the most seats?

Responding to Siddharth Dave’s argument, Chief Justice Suryakant said that we are against creating any narrative, hence the responsibility of this investigation has been entrusted to the CBI. We have faith in police and judiciary. But the media should perform its duties responsibly, not make claims based on the statements of any party. Also, Suryakant has appealed not to talk to the friends or relatives of both the parties related to this matter.

Meanwhile, public prosecutor Mehta, several attempts were made to record the statement of Giribala Singh, but she was not ready to answer. His mother-in-law claimed that she was not cooperating with the investigation. Giribala’s lawyers objected to it, saying, “Mehta’s claim is wrong and such things should not be discussed here. Giribala said that his reply has been recorded.

Senior advocate Siddharth Luthra, representing the victim’s family, told the court that the FIR was filed three days after the incident. Not only this, there was carelessness in keeping the evidence safe. Giribala Singh is submitting his own call data record, which is not allowed. Public prosecutor Tushar Mehta informed the court that Twisha’s second post-mortem was conducted on Sunday by a team from AIIMS, Delhi, as per the direction of the Madhya Pradesh High Court.