Was not getting posting for 8 months, IAS Rinku Singh Rahi resigned
Rinku Singh Rahi, an IAS officer of 2022 batch of Uttar Pradesh cadre, has surprised everyone by resigning from his post. He has alleged that he was neither being given any posting nor getting the opportunity to do any work for a long time. Rinku Singh Rahi says that he wanted to do public service but he was only getting a salary and was kept away from active role. Rinku Singh Rahi is the same officer who once started doing sit-ups by holding his ears and his video went viral on social media.
Rinku Singh Rahi was attached to the Revenue Council, where he had no concrete responsibility. He clarified in his resignation that a system was working in the state which was not allowing him to perform his role properly. He considered this situation unethical and decided to step down because he did not want to just take a salary without doing any work.
Also read: Mother leaves Instagram lover and returns for children, unique homecoming in UP
Rinku Singh Rahi’s past struggle
Rinku Singh Rahi has been recognized as a very honest and fearless officer. Before becoming an IAS, when he was in the Social Welfare Department, he had exposed a big scam. During that time, there was a fatal attack on him in which he was hit by several bullets. Despite those deep wounds, he did not lose courage and with his hard work passed the UPSC exam and became an IAS.
He was also in the news while posted as SDM in Puwayan tehsil of Shahjahanpur. There he had made sit-ups as a punishment to those who spread filth. When the lawyers protested against this and complained about the poor condition of the tehsil, Rinku Singh Rahi himself, accepting his responsibility, conducted sit-ups five times in front of everyone.
Also read: Navy jawan kills girlfriend, body parts found in fridge, head missing
There is talk of resignation everywhere.
Rinku Singh Rahi’s resignation has now become a topic of discussion because he has directly raised questions on the functioning of the system. His move has sparked a debate whether honest officers are getting adequate opportunities and environment to work.
Comments are closed.