Who is Indian diplomat Anupama Singh? Who called Pakistan a ‘monster’ on the global stage; brought me to my knees saying

By Samira Vishwas On Jun 20, 2026

Anupama Singh UNHRC Speech: Indian diplomat Anupama Singh has strongly reprimanded Islamabad in the United Nations. He described Pakistan as a collapsing ‘Frankenstein State’ Told, who has become a victim of the terrorist structure run by his own government. Anupama, who is working as the First Secretary in India’s Permanent Mission to the United Nations, made this strong comment during the 62nd session of the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) in Geneva on Friday.

India’s ‘right of reply’ during an interactive dialogue on the annual report of the UN High Commissioner Using this, he vehemently rejected the barrage of allegations made by Pakistan and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) regarding Jammu and Kashmir.

Who is Anupama Singh?

Anupama Singh is a career diplomat attached to the premier Indian Foreign Service (IFS). As the first Secretary to represent India in a major UN multilateral forum like the UNHRC, her portfolio focuses on articulating India’s foreign policy, understanding difficult international human rights dialogues and countering hostile geopolitical narratives on the global platform.

#WATCH | First Secretary at the Permanent Mission of India to the United Nations, Anupama Singh says, “India is compelled to exercise its right of reply in response to references made to it by Pakistan and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation. We categorically reject the… pic.twitter.com/pxj8es6bGA
— ANI (@ANI) June 18, 2026

Anupama Singh, known for her sharp and clear speaking skills Indian diplomat She represents a new generation of diplomats tasked with strengthening New Delhi’s frontline diplomatic defense against coordinated international propaganda.

What did Anupama Singh say in UNHRC?

The statement of Anupama Singh, who was replying on behalf of India in the United Nations, stood out for its sharp language and direct reply to Pakistan’s views.

1. Example of ‘Frankenstein State’

In the most quoted part of her speech, Anupama Singh criticized Pakistan’s historical dependence on proxy militant groups and called out the hypocrisy of its claims to garner worldwide sympathy. In his reply, he said that this is a country where the current Defense Minister calls hosting, training and deployment of terrorists as his government policy and yet Pakistan calls itself a victim of terrorism.

In fact, this is a dilemma which only Pakistan can face. It’s a living example of a Frankenstein state that is left stunned when its own monster strikes back.

2. Emphasis on action in PoJK

Anupama Singh brought the issue of human rights back to Islamabad and the Council’s attention to the areas occupied by Pakistan. Jammu and Kashmir (PoJK) towards the ongoing civil unrest and alleged government violence. He also mentioned the recent bloody action against the protesters, especially in Rawalakot. He argued that the ongoing tragedy in Rawalakot, the killing of hundreds of civilians and the brutal crackdown in PoJK are the predictable results of a system built on forceful occupation and repression. He said that noting that basic demands like food, electricity and respect are being met with bullets and cruelty.

3. The Indus Water Treaty is considered ‘old’ To declare

Anupama Singh directly linked cross-border terrorism to two-way resource sharing and declared that the 66-year-old Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) no longer matches the current realities after recent security escalations like the Pahalgam terror attack. Reiterating New Delhi’s firm Red Lines, he reminded the forum that the entire region of Jammu and Kashmir was, is and will always be an integral part of India.

Also read: Pakistan Storm: Rain and storm caused huge devastation in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, 7 died, administration failed

Calling Pakistan’s interference a seasonal drama, Anupama Singh responded in a stern tone to the neighboring country. He appealed to Pakistan to turn its attention away from Indian territories and instead focus on setting its broken house in order.