Federal Judge Strikes Down Trump Visa Suspension Covering 75 Countries/ TezzBuzz/ WASHINGTON/ J. Mansour/ A federal judge vacated a Trump administration policy that halted immigrant visa processing for nationals of 75 countries. The court ruled that Secretary of State Marco Rubio exceeded his authority by categorically denying visas based on nationality and public-assistance concerns. The decision allows affected families and employment-based applicants to resume pursuing their immigration cases.
Quick Look
- The policy suspended immigrant visa processing for 75 countries.
- Afghanistan, Iran, Russia and Somalia were among the affected nations.
- Judge Jeannette Vargas set aside the policy Friday.
- She called it “contrary to law and in excess of statutory authority.”
- The court found that Rubio exceeded his authority.
- The ruling said the policy violated the Immigration and Nationality Act.
- It rejected categorical visa refusals based on nationality.
- Two nonprofits and 11 individuals challenged the policy.
- Six plaintiffs had relatives who were refused visas.
- Five others had filed employment-based petitions.
- The administration cited concerns that applicants might use public assistance.
- The State Department declined to comment on pending litigation.
- The ruling follows other court setbacks for Trump’s immigration agenda.
Deep Look
Judge overturns sweeping visa suspension
A federal judge in New York vacated a Trump administration policy that suspended immigrant visa processing for applicants from 75 countries.
The affected nations included Afghanistan, Iran, Russia and Somalia.
The administration had argued that immigrants from the designated countries were more likely to require public assistance after arriving in the United States.
U.S. District Judge Jeannette Vargas set aside the policy Friday as “contrary to law and in excess of statutory authority.”
Court says Rubio exceeded his authority
Vargas, who was appointed by former President Joe Biden, ruled that Secretary of State Marco Rubio did not have the legal authority to impose the blanket suspension.
She said the policy “runs afoul” of the Immigration and Nationality Act because it required “the refusal of visas to eligible applicants without any basis in law.”
The ruling found that the administration could not categorically deny immigrant visas based on an applicant’s nationality without following the individualized criteria established by Congress.
Consular officers retain decision-making power
Vargas said the policy improperly displaced consular officers, whom Congress made responsible for evaluating individual visa applications.
“Congress imbued these officers with exclusive authority and discretion to determine if an immigrant is eligible for a visa based upon review of specific and detailed criteria set forth in the statute,” she wrote.
“The Policy, which categorically prohibits the issuance of immigrant visas based upon the nationality of the applicant, represents a direct abrogation of this statutory scheme.”
The ruling restores the individualized process under which consular officers consider each applicant’s eligibility.
Families and workers challenged policy
Two nonprofit organizations and 11 individuals brought the legal challenge.
Six of the individual plaintiffs had family members whose visa applications were refused under the policy.
The other five were outside the United States and had filed employment-based petitions seeking permission to immigrate.
The plaintiffs argued that the suspension unlawfully prevented otherwise eligible applicants from receiving meaningful consideration.
Immigration organization welcomes ruling
The Catholic Legal Immigration Network, known as CLINIC, was one of the organizations challenging the policy.
“We welcome this ruling because, at its heart, this case is about keeping families together,” said Anna Gallagher, CLINIC’s executive director.
“Catholic social teaching calls us to uphold the dignity of every person and recognize the family as the foundation of society,” she said. “This decision affirms both those values and the rule of law, allowing families to once again move forward toward reunification.”
Administration defends screening standards
Trump has expanded immigration and travel restrictions, many of which apply to people from countries in Africa, Asia and Latin America.
The State Department said Saturday that the administration is “protecting the American people by upholding the highest standards of screening and vetting of visa applicants.”
The department declined to comment further because the litigation remains pending.
Policy was linked to public-charge rules
When the suspension was announced, the State Department said consular officers had been instructed to stop processing immigrant visa applications from the 75 countries.
The directive implemented a broader November order tightening scrutiny of prospective immigrants who might become “public charges” by relying on government benefits.
Using data from the Council of Economic Advisersthe department said more than 30% of households containing immigrants from the affected countries received some form of public assistance.
The court found that those generalized statistics did not authorize the government to refuse visas categorically to eligible applicants.
Non-immigrant applicants also faced scrutiny
A separate State Department notice sent to American embassies and consulates addressed temporary, non-immigrant visa applicants.
It instructed officials to “fully vet and screen” applicants for the possibility that they might seek public benefits while in the United States.
The cable repeatedly placed the burden on applicants to show that they would not apply for benefits.
Consular officers who suspected an applicant might seek public assistance were directed to require additional documentation demonstrating adequate financial resources.
Latest court setback for immigration agenda
The decision is the latest federal court ruling to disrupt Trump’s immigration policies.
In June, another federal judge invalidated an administration policy that made it more difficult for immigrants from dozens of countries to enter or remain in the United States.
That policy affected asylum applications, work permits, green cards and citizenship cases.
The judge said it had placed countless immigrants “into indeterminate legal limbo” and concluded that U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services had disregarded federal law.
More on US News