‘Maharashtra Epistin Files’ controversy deepens, Deepali Syed said on notice of Rs 25 crore – ‘We are laughing’

Nashik’s famous Ashok Kharat The film is said to be based on the case ‘Maharashtra Epistin Files’ It has been embroiled in controversies even before its release. The political and legal controversy regarding the film is deepening. meanwhile Rupali Chakankar Film director, producer and actress Deepali Syed To Defamation notice of Rs 25 crore Has sent.

Rupali Chakankar says that it is not appropriate to make and release a film based on a case whose hearing is still going on in the court. He alleges that this may affect his image.

Actress after receiving notice Deepali Syed Gave his response in a press conference. They said that, “A claim of Rs 25 crore has been made against us. We laugh at those who have made this claim.”

Deepali Syed clarified that the film is not an autobiography of any person and the name of any real person is not used in it. He said that if an attempt is made to stop a film without solid grounds, it is against the freedom of expression.

He also raised the question as to why efforts are being made to stop the film from being released. He said that if there is any legal issue then it will be answered in the court.

film director Swaroop Sawant also said that the purpose of this film is not to tarnish anyone’s image, but to create awareness in the society. women harassment and fake babas To spread awareness against. He said that the film will be as per its schedule. 2 October Will be released on.

The director also clarified that the release of the film will not be postponed for the time being due to any pressure or legal notice.

At present, this controversy has sparked a new debate in the Marathi film industry and political circles. Now everyone’s eyes are on what further legal steps Rupali Chakankar takes and in which direction the hearing of this case moves in the court.

Note: All allegations and claims made in this matter are those of the respective parties. The matter is pending in the court, so the final conclusion will come only after the judicial process is completed.