Actor Rajpal Yadav, who reached the Supreme Court in the check bounce case, mentioned about his film life and the loss caused by this old controversy during the hearing. During this time, a light conversation also took place between CJI Surya Kant and Rajpal Yadav, which brought the hearing into discussion. However, the matter behind the funny dialogue is quite serious and the court has given clear instructions regarding the payment. Let us know what was said in it…
The court said that deposit Rs 2 crore by October 13, only after that we will consider your petition against that order of Delhi HC, that is, in a way, the court has also given an ultimatum to the actor. Now the video of the conversation between Governor Yadav and the court is going viral on social media. In the video, it can be seen how Rajpal Yadav is joking with the CJI with folded hands. What order has the court given him and what is the relief for him?
Rajpal Yadav said – I will make a film ’16 Sawan Jheel Ke’
Conversation between CJI Surya Kant and Rajpal Yadav. During the hearing in the Supreme Court, actor Rajpal Yadav himself presented his side before the bench headed by Justice Surya Kant. The conversation started in a light-hearted manner. CJI Surya Kant asked Rajpal Yadav whether he is making something new or not? Rajpal Yadav folded his hands and said, ‘Sir, I salute you. Have done two hundred and fifty films. I have also incurred a loss of Rs 250 crore in the last 13 years. After this, while referring to his film Ata Pata Lapata, he said that he had lost around Rs 17 crore in this film.
Rajpal Yadav claimed that the dispute of about Rs 5 crore caused him a total loss of Rs 22 crore. He said that the film was going to be released in around 1200 theatres, but due to controversy and stay the film could not be released. The actor further said that he has been facing this matter for the last 16 years. He said that he has been entertaining people for about 17 years and now this matter has affected a large part of his life.
After listening to Rajpal Yadav, CJI Surya Kant said in a light tone, ‘Entertain people by making a good film.’ Rajpal Yadav also replied on this in a filmy style. He said that he is going to make a film on this entire issue and will name it ’16 Sawan’. In this way, this conversation between CJI Surya Kant and Rajpal Yadav during the hearing of a serious legal case came into discussion. However, the original case going on in the court is related to check bounce and outstanding amount.
‘5 crores drowned 22 crores’
Referring to his loss before the court, Rajpal Yadav said that the dispute of Rs 5 crore related to the film caused him a loss of about Rs 22 crore. He claimed that the film could not get a theatrical release and he had to suffer financial loss. This was the point made by Rajpal Yadav during the hearing.
What is the matter?
This case is related to a loan of about Rs 5 crore related to Rajpal Yadav’s 2010 film ‘Ata Pata Lapata’ and the check issued for its payment. Many checks bounced in the case and the dispute continued in the courts for a long time. Wednesday’s hearing in the Supreme Court was related to this old check bounce controversy.
Court asked to deposit Rs 2 crore
The Supreme Court accepted the proposal presented by Rajpal Yadav and decided the process of depositing a total of Rs 2 crore. Rajpal Yadav has made arrangements to deposit a demand draft of Rs 1.15 crore in the court, while Rs 85 lakh is to be deposited by the prospective buyer of his ancestral property. The court has asked to fix a further schedule for payment of the remaining amount. At the same time, the bench also clarified that the basis of giving relief to the actor is mainly to get the complainant back his money.
Joking in the court, but also a warning
Even though the tone of conversation in the hearing remained light for some time, the court also expressed displeasure over Rajpal Yadav’s previous compliance. Justice Joymalya Bagchi warned that if orders are not followed, even increasing the punishment can be considered, that is, on one hand, Rajpal Yadav named his problem in a filmy style as ’16 Sawan Jheel Ke’, while on the other hand, the Supreme Court made it clear that payment of money and court orders have to be taken seriously.