Trump’s Proposed Arch Could Harm Washington Historic Sites, NPS Report Says/ TezzBuzz/ WASHINGTON/ J. Mansour/ President Donald Trump’s proposed 250-foot memorial arch could damage the historical integrity of dozens of landmarks, according to a National Park Service assessment. The report says the gilded structure would disrupt carefully designed sightlines connecting the Lincoln Memorial, Memorial Bridge and Arlington House. The project has received preliminary federal approval but faces a lawsuit arguing that construction on National Park Service land requires congressional authorization.
Quick Look
- Trump has proposed a gilded memorial arch rising 250 feet.
- The National Park Service says it could affect dozens of historic properties.
- The arch would alter important visual and spatial relationships among Washington landmarks.
- Its proposed location is within the historic Memorial Avenue Corridor.
- The structure could disrupt the alignment between the Lincoln Memorial, Memorial Bridge and Arlington House.
- A key arts commission has already granted the design preliminary approval.
- All current U.S. Commission of Fine Arts members were appointed by Trump.
- The National Capital Planning Commission approved the proposed site and preliminary plans.
- The planning commission is expected to revisit the project in September.
- Three veterans and a historian have sued to block construction.
- The plaintiffs argue that the arch requires congressional approval.
- The White House did not immediately comment on the Park Service report.
Deep Look
NPS Warns Trump Arch Could Harm Historic Sites
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump’s proposed 250-foot-tall, or 76-meter, memorial arch could disrupt the historical significance of dozens of nearby properties, according to a National Park Service assessment.
The planned gilded arch would transform a prominent area of Washington where monuments, buildings and landscapes have been deliberately arranged to represent key moments in American history.
Many of the capital’s landmarks were designed to maintain sightlines and symbolic connections with other historically important sites.
Arch Would Alter Historic Sightlines
The National Park Service concluded that the arch could affect the “integrity” of dozens of historic properties.
According to the assessment, the structure would change “character-defining visual and spatial relationships” among the landmarks surrounding its proposed location.
The Park Service published its assessment Monday, adding a new complication to a project that has already advanced through several stages of federal review.
Proposed Site Is Part of Memorial Avenue Corridor
The immediate project area is located within the Memorial Avenue Corridor cultural landscape.
The NPS report described it as “a nationally significant historic designed landscape extending between the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C., and Arlington National Cemetery in Arlington, Virginia.”
The corridor was designed to connect major memorial spaces across the Potomac River and create a ceremonial landscape with national significance.
Lincoln Memorial Alignment Could Be Disrupted
One of the report’s central concerns involves the visual alignment linking the Lincoln Memorial, Memorial Bridge and Arlington House.
Arlington House was previously the home of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee.
The proposed arch would interrupt the carefully planned line connecting those landmarks.
“The bridge alignment and associated ceremonial landscape were intended to physically and symbolically unite North and South through a coordinated monumental composition extending across the Potomac River,” the report said.
Project Advanced Under Trump-Appointed Commissions
The Park Service assessment could complicate a proposal that has moved through several approval stages before planning bodies filled with Trump appointees and allies.
Trump proposed the arch’s design, which has already received preliminary approval from the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts.
All members of that commission were appointed by Trump.
The National Capital Planning Commission approved the location and preliminary plans during its July meeting.
The commission is expected to review the project again in September.
Arch Is Part of Trump’s Washington Building Agenda
The proposed arch is one of several projects Trump is pursuing as he seeks to leave a lasting architectural imprint on Washington.
Because the structure could dramatically change the capital’s sightlines, it has generated opposition from preservation advocates and other critics.
The project is also among several Trump construction proposals currently involved in litigation.
Veterans and Historian File Lawsuit
Three military veterans and a historian have filed a lawsuit challenging construction of the arch.
The plaintiffs argue that the administration cannot legally build the monument without approval from Congress.
They contend that construction of a monument in a historically and symbolically important section of Washington requires specific legislative authorization.
Attorney Says Congress Must Authorize Project
Nicolas Sansone, an attorney with Public Citizen Litigation Group, represents the plaintiffs.
“Our claim is essentially that none of this has any authorization to be happening in the first place,” said Nicolas Sansone, an attorney with Public Citizen Litigation Group representing the plaintiffs.
Authorization of the construction of a monument “in the core of Washington, D.C., on National Park Service land” requires an act of Congress, he said.
Sansone said the National Park Service assessment supports the plaintiffs’ warnings about the project’s effect on the solemn and symbolic character of the area.
“I think its very significant that the National Park Service itself understands that this is the effect that it’s going to have,” Sansone said.
White House Offers No Immediate Response
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the National Park Service assessment.
The project’s future could depend on further planning reviews, the outcome of the lawsuit and whether the administration seeks congressional authorization.
More on US News