By Sudhir Anand
There is a global economic story unfolding in plain sight that much of the Western conversation still treats as secondary.
The United States and China are reorganizing trade around tariffs, export controls and national security. Europe is struggling with weak growth, higher energy costs and pressure on its industrial base. Global supply chains are being tested by conflicts, shipping disruptions and the renewed politicization of commerce. Investors have pulled money from emerging markets whenever the dollar rises or geopolitical risks intensify.
India has faced all of those pressures.
It has also continued growing faster than every other major economy.
India’s economy expanded by an estimated 7.7 percent during the fiscal year that ended in March 2026. Growth reached 7.8 percent during the January to March quarter, supported by construction, agriculture and a notable increase in private investment. The World Bank expects growth to moderate to approximately 6.6 percent during the current fiscal year, but that would still leave India among the fastest growing large economies in a world expected to expand by only about 2.5 percent in 2026.
That gap is the story.
India is not immune to the disorder surrounding it. It remains vulnerable to expensive oil, foreign capital outflows, a weaker rupee, climate shocks and international trade disputes. But the country is increasingly demonstrating that it possesses something many export dependent economies do not: enough domestic demand, demographic scale and policy flexibility to absorb external pressure without surrendering its broader growth trajectory.
The global turmoil is not merely testing India.
In several important ways, it is creating the conditions for India’s ascent.
The Domestic Market Is India’s First Line of Defence
India’s greatest economic advantage is not a particular factory, trade agreement or government incentive.
It is scale.
Private consumption accounts for more than half of the economy. That means growth does not depend entirely on American consumers buying Indian goods or European companies increasing investment. More than 1.4 billion people create an enormous internal market for housing, financial services, telecommunications, transportation, food, entertainment and consumer products.
Private consumer spending expanded by 7.1 percent during the March quarter. Private investment grew by 10.8 percent, accelerating from the previous quarter.
Those figures matter because India’s recent expansion has often been criticized for depending too heavily on government infrastructure spending. Roads, railways, airports, power systems and industrial corridors have played an essential role, but public expenditure alone cannot sustain a historic economic transformation.
A durable growth cycle requires businesses to begin investing at the same scale.
The March quarter offered evidence that this process may finally be strengthening. Companies are seeing a growing consumer market, improving infrastructure, expanding digital access and new opportunities created by the relocation of global supply chains.
India has not recession proofed itself. No country can.
Its large internal market does, however, provide a powerful cushion. Vietnam, Bangladesh and many smaller manufacturing economies can be severely affected when foreign orders decline. India can continue expanding even when exports weaken because domestic demand remains capable of carrying a greater share of economic activity.
This is one reason India has remained resilient while the international environment has become more hostile.
The United States Tariff Crisis Did Not Break India
The most severe test arrived through Washington.
Indian exports were subjected to American tariffs of as much as 50 percent during 2025. The measures included a reciprocal tariff and an additional penalty linked to India’s purchases of Russian oil.
The duties threatened labour intensive sectors such as textiles, jewellery and leather products while creating uncertainty for companies deciding whether to use India as an export base.
India did not escape unharmed. Exporters faced lost orders, lower margins and difficult negotiations with American customers.
But the economy continued growing.
In February 2026, Washington and New Delhi announced the framework for an interim trade arrangement. The proposal would lower the general American tariff on qualifying Indian goods to 18 percent while India reduced barriers affecting American industrial and agricultural products.
India also expressed an intention to purchase more than $500 billion in American energy, technology, coal and other products over time.
That agreement has not completely settled the issue. A later United States Supreme Court ruling disrupted part of the tariff mechanism, and both governments were still negotiating the final interim arrangement in late June.
The trade uncertainty therefore has not disappeared.
Even so, the episode revealed something important about India’s position. Washington could pressure India, but it could not treat the country as economically disposable. American companies need access to India’s consumers, workers, technology sector and manufacturing capacity. The United States also views India as an important strategic counterweight to China.
India required tariff relief.
The United States required India.
That mutual dependence gave New Delhi negotiating power that most developing economies do not possess.
The S&P Upgrade Was More Than Symbolism
In August 2025, S&P Global raised India’s sovereign credit rating from BBB minus to BBB, the country’s first upgrade from the agency in 18 years.
The decision reflected India’s strong growth, improved monetary policy credibility and progress in controlling government finances.
Credit ratings do not transform an economy by themselves. India continues to carry high public debt, while Fitch and Moody’s have maintained lower ratings than S&P.
Nevertheless, the upgrade represented institutional recognition that India’s economic structure had changed.
The country that was once viewed primarily through the lens of deficits, bureaucracy and currency instability is increasingly being evaluated through growth, infrastructure, digitalization and industrial potential.
That change affects how multinational corporations, pension funds and global investors assess long term risk.
India is no longer being presented simply as a future opportunity.
Increasingly, it is being treated as a market that global companies cannot afford to ignore.
China Plus One Is Finally Becoming Physical
For years, executives discussed a China Plus One strategy.
The idea was simple. Companies would continue producing in China while developing a second manufacturing base elsewhere to reduce their exposure to political tensions, tariffs, lockdowns and supply chain disruptions.
For much of that period, the strategy remained more presentation than reality.
In 2026, it is becoming physical.
Factories are being built. Supplier networks are expanding. Electronics exports are rising. Companies are making decisions that would have appeared unrealistic a decade ago.
India received $81.04 billion in foreign direct investment during fiscal 2024 to 2025, a 14 percent increase from the previous year. Manufacturing investment grew by 18 percent to $19.04 billion.
Those numbers do not mean India has replaced China.
China possesses an industrial ecosystem developed over several decades, involving advanced ports, enormous supplier networks, highly productive factories and a depth of component manufacturing that India cannot yet match.
But India no longer needs to replace China to win.
It needs to capture enough of the production being diversified away from China to create self reinforcing industrial clusters of its own.
That process has already started in electronics.
Apple Is the Proof of Concept
Apple’s expansion in India may be the clearest evidence that the country’s manufacturing ambitions are becoming credible.
Indian iPhone exports reportedly reached approximately $23 billion in 2025, while the country produced an estimated one quarter of Apple’s global iPhone output. Apple suppliers including Foxconn and Tata Electronics have expanded production as the company attempts to reduce its reliance on China.
This is significant because iPhone manufacturing is not an ordinary assembly contract.
Apple operates one of the world’s most demanding consumer electronics supply chains. Suppliers must satisfy strict requirements involving quality, volume, security, timing and component coordination.
A country capable of producing tens of millions of iPhones has passed a test that many emerging manufacturing locations cannot.
However, India must be honest about what this achievement does and does not mean.
Final assembly captures only one portion of a product’s value. Many advanced displays, chips, sensors, production tools and subcomponents continue to come from East Asian supply chains, including China.
India’s next challenge is to move deeper.
It must attract component makers, equipment suppliers, material producers, design companies and research operations. The objective cannot simply be to assemble products designed elsewhere from parts manufactured elsewhere.
The objective must be to capture a growing share of the intellectual property, engineering and component value inside those products.
The PLI Experiment Is Producing Results
The Production Linked Incentive program has become the central policy behind India’s manufacturing push.
The program covers 14 sectors, including electronics, pharmaceuticals, automobiles, telecommunications equipment, solar modules, specialty steel and advanced batteries. Rather than supporting companies merely for announcing factories, the government links incentives to actual production and sales.
By early 2026, 836 applications had been approved under programs carrying a combined allocation of approximately ₹1.91 lakh crore. The government reported that exports associated with the incentive programs had exceeded ₹8.2 lakh crore.
The strongest results have appeared in mobile devices and electronics.
Critics are correct to ask whether these incentives create genuinely competitive industries or factories that remain dependent on permanent government support. They are also correct that public money should not become a substitute for better infrastructure, simpler regulation and improved education.
But the early evidence suggests that PLI has accomplished something previous industrial policies often failed to do.
It has helped transform manufacturing announcements into real production.
India now needs to make the transition from subsidized entry to competitive permanence. A factory attracted by incentives must eventually remain because India offers productivity, skills, infrastructure and access to markets.
That is the difference between a temporary industrial program and an economic transformation.
India Is Building Services and Manufacturing Together
India’s rise is unusual because it is not following the conventional development path in which agriculture gives way to factories before services become dominant.
India developed a globally competitive technology and business services industry before it built a comparable manufacturing base.
That once appeared to be a weakness. It may now become an advantage.
Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Pune, Chennai and the National Capital Region already support enormous concentrations of software engineers, financial analysts, researchers and corporate service workers. Global companies use India not only for customer support but for product development, cybersecurity, financial modelling, artificial intelligence and pharmaceutical research.
Services exports reached more than $354 billion during the first ten months of fiscal 2025 to 2026.
That ecosystem can now support the manufacturing expansion.
Modern factories depend on software, data systems, engineering, logistics management, automation and digital design. India’s technology workforce can supply capabilities that earlier manufacturing powers had to develop gradually.
The distinction between a technology economy and a manufacturing economy is disappearing.
Amazon’s June 2026 announcement of an additional $13 billion investment in Indian cloud and artificial intelligence infrastructure illustrates this convergence. The investment followed large commitments from Microsoft and Google.
India is becoming a location where global companies can manufacture devices, develop software, operate cloud systems and sell products into one of the world’s largest consumer markets.
Few countries can offer all four.
The China Pivot Is Pragmatism, Not Surrender
One of India’s most revealing decisions came in March 2026.
The government partially eased restrictions on investments connected to countries sharing a land border with India, rules that had been tightened after the deadly 2020 confrontation with China.
Under the new policy, non controlling investments involving Chinese beneficial ownership of up to 10 percent may enter through the automatic route, subject to applicable rules. India also created an expedited approval process for selected manufacturing investments involving electronics, capital goods, semiconductor inputs and related sectors.
This was not a geopolitical reconciliation.
Security screening remains in place, and mistrust between India and China has not disappeared.
It was an admission of industrial reality.
India wants to compete with China, but many of the machines, components, materials and technical specialists required to establish manufacturing in India still come from China.
Blocking all Chinese participation was slowing Indian factories more than it was weakening the Chinese economy.
The revised policy attempts to separate strategic control from useful industrial cooperation. India can accept minority capital, technology and equipment while limiting Chinese ownership of sensitive assets.
This is a difficult balance, but it is more sophisticated than total separation.
India is attempting to use parts of China’s manufacturing ecosystem to accelerate the construction of an alternative to China’s manufacturing dominance.
India Is Still Deeply Dependent on China
The China Plus One story can easily become exaggerated.
India’s trade deficit with China reached a record $99.2 billion during fiscal 2024 to 2025. Imports included electronics, batteries, machinery, chemicals and solar components.
Some of India’s fastest growing exports depend on Chinese inputs.
That means India can increase its exports while becoming more dependent on imported components at the same time.
This is why the next stage of the manufacturing strategy is more difficult than the first.
Assembling a smartphone can be achieved relatively quickly. Building a domestic ecosystem capable of producing advanced displays, precision machinery, semiconductor equipment and specialty materials requires years of investment and technical development.
China’s advantage is not merely low wages.
It is completeness.
India’s opportunity lies in steadily reducing that gap rather than pretending it has already closed.
Semiconductors Are the Test
Nothing illustrates the challenge more clearly than semiconductors.
India has spent decades designing chips and producing semiconductor engineers, but it has lacked large scale commercial fabrication.
That is beginning to change.
Tata Electronics is constructing a major semiconductor fabrication plant in Dholera, Gujarat, in partnership with Taiwan’s PSMC. Additional facilities involving Micron, CG Power and other companies are expanding semiconductor assembly, packaging and testing.
India has also joined international efforts intended to strengthen semiconductor, artificial intelligence and critical technology supply chains outside China.
In May 2026, India and the United States signed a framework covering the mining and processing of critical minerals and rare earth elements. These materials are essential for semiconductors, electric vehicles, defence equipment, renewable energy and advanced electronics.
The agreement gives India an opportunity to move beyond final assembly and participate in the upstream foundations of modern technology.
But semiconductor ambition must remain grounded.
Constructing a building is not the same as operating a competitive fabrication plant. Chip production requires extreme precision, reliable power, enormous quantities of clean water, advanced equipment, experienced workers and high manufacturing yields.
India’s semiconductor program will be judged not by ribbon cuttings but by the number, quality and cost of chips it can produce consistently.
Strategic Autonomy Is Becoming More Difficult
India’s geopolitical strategy has long been based on autonomy rather than permanent alignment.
It buys weapons and energy from Russia, expands technology and defence ties with the United States, trades heavily with China, works with Europe and maintains strong relationships across the Gulf and Global South.
India’s 2026 BRICS chairship reinforces its attempt to act as a bridge between different power centres.
This flexibility has served the country well.
However, economic success will make neutrality more difficult, not easier.
A smaller India could avoid choosing sides because other powers did not view every Indian decision as globally consequential. A much larger India will face greater pressure to take positions on technology controls, conflicts, sanctions, energy and trade.
The United States trade framework already demonstrates this tension. Washington linked tariff relief partly to India’s Russian oil purchases and sought greater alignment on export controls and economic security.
India will continue pursuing strategic autonomy, but autonomy does not mean freedom from consequences.
The country’s challenge will be to cooperate closely enough with the United States and its allies to receive technology and investment without surrendering the independent foreign policy it considers central to its identity.
Infrastructure Is Still the Deciding Factor
India’s greatest manufacturing weakness has historically been the difficulty of moving materials, power and products efficiently.
Companies have faced congested ports, unreliable electricity, complicated land acquisition and slow movement between industrial centres.
The country has made substantial progress. It has expanded highways, freight railways, airports, ports and digital government services. India rose to 38th place in the World Bank’s 2023 Logistics Performance Index, six positions above its 2018 ranking.
Programs including PM Gati Shakti are intended to coordinate roads, railways, ports, industrial corridors and logistics facilities rather than developing each one separately.
But the gap with China remains significant.
China can connect a factory to a dense network of suppliers, ports and transportation infrastructure with extraordinary speed. India is still constructing that network.
This is where the next decade will be won or lost.
Incentives can persuade a company to open a factory. Only reliable logistics, power, workers and suppliers will persuade it to expand that factory repeatedly.
Growth Must Produce Enough Good Jobs
India’s economic success cannot be measured only through GDP.
Millions of young Indians enter the labour force every year. The country requires employment at a scale that technology services and highly automated factories cannot provide alone.
Electronics, textiles, food processing, construction, tourism and small manufacturing businesses will therefore remain essential.
India must avoid producing a two speed economy in which a globally competitive professional class prospers while large numbers of workers remain trapped in insecure and low productivity employment.
Education is part of the challenge.
India produces large numbers of engineers, but employers continue reporting gaps in practical skills, manufacturing experience and advanced technical training. Semiconductor plants and automated factories require technicians, tool operators and process specialists, not only software developers.
The country must connect industrial policy with vocational education, apprenticeships and labour mobility.
A manufacturing boom without broad employment would produce impressive export statistics but fail to achieve the social transformation India needs.
The Private Investment Cycle May Be Starting
For years, the Indian government carried much of the investment burden.
The state built highways, railways and public infrastructure while private companies remained cautious after earlier debt cycles and banking problems.
The 10.8 percent increase in private investment during the March quarter suggests that the balance may be changing.
Corporate balance sheets are generally healthier than they were during the previous investment cycle. Banks have resolved many old bad loans. Consumer demand remains strong, and trade arrangements have reduced some uncertainty.
If private investment joins public capital spending on a sustained basis, India could enter a much more powerful phase of growth.
Factories attract suppliers. Suppliers create jobs. Jobs increase consumption. Consumption justifies more investment.
That is the cycle India is attempting to activate.
The danger is that external shocks, high borrowing costs or policy uncertainty could interrupt it before it becomes self sustaining.
The Opportunity Created by Disorder
Global disorder does not guarantee India’s success.
Tariffs can divert factories toward India, but they can also weaken global demand. Conflict can increase India’s strategic importance, but it can also raise oil prices. Supply chain diversification can attract investment, but India must still compete with Vietnam, Mexico, Indonesia and Eastern Europe.
India’s rise will not occur simply because China faces pressure.
It will occur only if India continues building the physical and institutional capacity required to absorb the opportunity.
That means faster courts, predictable taxation, reliable infrastructure, stronger education, easier land acquisition and less bureaucratic friction.
The world is creating an opening.
India must still walk through it.
Watch What India Builds After the Storm
The economic story of 2026 is not that India has conquered every historical weakness.
It has not.
India remains dependent on imported energy and Chinese industrial components. Its infrastructure remains uneven. Its public finances require discipline, and its growth must create far more productive employment.
The story is that India is now responding to its weaknesses with scale, capital and increasingly coherent policy.
It is using production incentives to attract factories. It is using trade negotiations to improve market access. It is cautiously reopening Chinese investment where it serves Indian manufacturing. It is developing semiconductor plants, freight corridors, data centres and critical mineral partnerships.
Most importantly, it is doing these things while maintaining one of the strongest growth rates in the world.
The global economy is fragmenting into competing blocs, protected supply chains and strategic industries. Countries that control manufacturing, technology, energy and large consumer markets will possess increasing power.
India is building positions in all four.
The world should watch India during the turmoil.
But the more important moment will come afterward, when the factories are operating, the infrastructure is connected and the investments made during the crisis begin producing at scale.
India is not merely surviving the storm.
It is attempting to construct the economy that emerges from it.
Comments are closed.