Suchika looked disappointed with the decision despite dominating the fight in the semi-finals against Singapore's Hui Hoon Tun. After the decision he expressed his opposition to arbitration. During arbitration, the judges reviewed the match and declared it a draw.
As per Asian Mixed Martial Arts Association (AMMA) rules, in case of a draw, the fighter at lower weight is declared the winner. Suchika expressed her displeasure over this controversial decision and losing the medal after arbitration and accused her of corruption.
Suchika, in an exclusive conversation with IANS, said, “I think he had to win because the federation is from Singapore. Even if I had weighed a little less, the decision would have been against me. He put everything on weight. He thought about his country, not about the player. There is corruption everywhere; I have seen it here today too.”
Suchika claimed that she did not agree with the referee's decision after the fight, as she had dominated the fight. “I gave my 100 percent. I don't even agree with the decision that went in her favor because I thought I was going to win,” she said.
Suchika told, “I am originally from Uttarakhand, but grew up in Delhi and got married in Haryana. In my parents' home, I have parents, we have 4 sisters and 1 brother. In my in-laws, I have mother-in-law, mother and a brother, who are very supportive. I have been married for 6-8 years, they have never stopped me for anything. I have got full support from both the families. I give this medal to my family to support.”
Following the protest, Suchika's coach Nikhil Kunder also spoke on the controversial arbitration decision. Kunder said that in the recheck there was no winner, hence the result remained a tie and the weight rule came into effect.