Rajpal Yadav gets last chance from Supreme Court, hearing continues in check bounce case

Supreme Court's displeasure

Actor Rajpal Yadav has faced the wrath of the Supreme Court in the check bounce case of Rs 7.5 crore. The court took strong notice of non-compliance of instructions and provided them a last opportunity to make the payment.

Court's comment on draft of Rs 50 lakh

During the hearing, a photocopy of the demand draft of Rs 50 lakh was produced in the court. On this, Justice Joymala Bagchi strongly reprimanded Rajpal Yadav's lawyer. The court said that appropriate attitude should be adopted during the hearing.

indication of rejection of petition

The Supreme Court indicated that it could dismiss Rajpal Yadav's petition, but did not do so immediately so that the complainant could get the amount. The court has given last chance till Tuesday for payment. The next hearing of the case will be on Wednesday.

Relief received in September

In September, the Supreme Court had given relief to Rajpal Yadav by directing him to deposit a demand draft of Rs 2 crore within two weeks. Rajpal Yadav and his wife Radha Yadav had challenged the decision of Delhi High Court in the Supreme Court.

Controversy over seven check bounce cases

This case pertains to seven check bounce cases related to Murali Projects Private Limited. The Delhi High Court had convicted Rajpal Yadav and sentenced him to three months' imprisonment in each case. Now the Supreme Court has given them the last opportunity for payment.

film related matter

The controversy pertains to Rajpal Yadav's 2012 directorial venture 'Ata Pata Lapata', which was not successful at the box office. The interest on the loan taken for this film kept increasing, which put financial pressure on the actor.


New beginning after struggle

Rajpal Yadav had mentioned financial and emotional problems before going to jail. After his arrest, people like Salman Khan and Sonu Sood had offered financial help. Now it has become important for them to follow the order of the Supreme Court.

Leave a Comment