Mohsin Khan ran through KKR but it was Angkrish Raghuvanshi’s obstructing the field dismissal that started it all

There are controversial dismissals and then there are moments that stop a match entirely, moments where players argue, coaches sprint to the fourth umpire, and commentary boxes fall momentarily silent trying to make sense of what just happened.

The Ekana Stadium got one of those moments on Sunday evening when Angkrish Raghuvanshi became only the fourth batter in IPL history to be given out obstructing the field, a decision so unexpected and so disputed that it essentially ended KKR’s innings as a contest before the powerplay had even concluded.

IPL 2026: What happened and why the third umpire ruled Angkrish Raghuvanshi out

The incident occurred on the final ball of the fifth over, bowled by Prince Yadav. Angkrish Raghuvanshi pushed the ball towards mid-on and set off for a single, only to be sent back halfway by Cameron Green. Mohammed Shami collected and fired a throw towards the striker’s end and as Raghuvanshi scrambled to get back into his crease, the throw struck him and LSG went up for the appeal.

In real time it looked like nothing more than a messy runout attempt gone wrong. The third umpire saw something different. After a lengthy review, the decision came down to one thing, Angkrish Raghuvanshi’s turning radius.

The third umpire ruled that he had significantly changed his running direction, putting himself between Shami’s throw and the stumps, and that the deviation was more than what could be considered natural or accidental.

Under Law 37, that is enough. It does not matter whether the throw would have hit the stumps. The act of changing direction to obstruct the fielder’s attempt is the offence, and the third umpire decided Angkrish Raghuvanshi was guilty of it.

LSG vs KKR: The reaction and what it could cost Angkrish Raghuvanshi beyond the wicket

Angkrish Raghuvanshi was furious and made no attempt to hide it. He had words with the on-field umpires, a conversation that was not going to change anything and may yet cost him further.

On his way back to the dugout he slammed his bat against the boundary cushion and flung his helmet in visible anger, while KKR bowling coach Abhishek Nayar engaged in an animated exchange with the fourth umpire that continued long after the decision had been confirmed.

The KKR camp was stunned, the commentators were divided, and the crowd at Ekana understood immediately that something significant had just happened.

Angkrish Raghuvanshi’s visible dissent, the bat, the helmet, the argument, is likely to attract attention from the ICC match referee and could result in a Level 1 or Level 2 breach of the IPL Code of Conduct, carrying either a match-fee fine or a one-game suspension for a side that cannot afford to lose any more players to any more misfortune.

Comments are closed.