Sonam Raghuvanshi case: What did the Supreme Court say when Ketan-Siya’s name came up? Why did you refuse to reject the bail?

The recent comment of the Supreme Court in the case related to Sonam Raghuvanshi has sparked discussion in the legal circles. The matter became more serious when the names of Ketan and Siya were mentioned before the court. Everyone is curious to know what is the connection of these names in the court and why did the Supreme Court not reject the bail plea of ​​the accused? After analyzing the judicial process and evidence, this stance of the court has been understandable even to the legal experts. Why did Ketan-Siya’s name crop up in the court? When this matter came up during the hearing, the names of Ketan and Siya were mentioned with the aim of connecting the links of the case. The purpose of mentioning this name was to explore the possibility of a third party or conspiracy in the case. However, the Court viewed the mention of this name as a part of the circumstances rather than as completely solid evidence. Legal experts believe that the court’s focus was on whether the accused’s association with these names was sufficient to deny him bail or not. Why did the Supreme Court grant bail? The Supreme Court clarified that mere mention of a name is not sufficient ground to reject bail. The court closely observed the seriousness of the case and the progress of the investigation so far. The main argument behind not rejecting the bail was that the prosecution could not present conclusive evidence against the accused which could prove that the investigation would be affected by the accused’s stay away. This decision of the Supreme Court has once again given the message that the principle of justice is not based only on allegations, but on the strength of evidence.