Pawan Kheda bail hearing, heated debate between Singhvi and Assam government in Supreme Court, know what happened in the court room – ..

News India Live, Digital Desk: congress leader Pawan Khera High-voltage drama was once again seen in the Supreme Court in the case of cancellation of bail plea of ​​and FIRs registered against him. live hindustan According to the report, during the hearing, senior Congress lawyer Abhishek Manu Singhvi There was a heated argument between the lawyers representing the Assam government and the Assam government (represented by Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma).

Context of the Case

This whole matter started with a controversial comment made by Pawan Kheda in the name of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. After this, many cases were registered against him in Assam and Uttar Pradesh.

Arrest: He was arrested by Assam Police after deboarding the plane at Delhi airport, after which the Supreme Court granted him interim relief.

Main Demand: Kheda has demanded that all the FIRs registered in different states should be clubbed together and they should be cancelled.

What was the debate in the court room? (The Legal Clash)

During the hearing, both sides presented strong arguments:

Arguments of Abhishek Manu Singhvi (Pawan Kheda’s lawyer):

Freedom of expression: Singhvi argued that filing separate FIRs in multiple states for one statement is abuse of law and oppression.

Demand for Aggregation: He urged the court to transfer all the cases to one place so that the accused do not have to travel to different states again and again.

Nature of Statement: He said that Kheda has already clarified that it was a case of slip of tongue and he has also expressed regret for it.

Stand of Assam government and prosecution:

Constitutional Dignity: Lawyers for the Assam government argued that such remarks against the Prime Minister are not just a personal insult but an attempt to disturb public peace and insult the dignity of constitutional offices.

legal process: He argued that the action of Assam Police was completely lawful and the investigation is still in the initial stage, hence the FIR should not be cancelled.

Reference to the Chief Minister: Representing Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma, the lawyers said that it is the responsibility of the police to maintain law and order in the state and such statements can have serious consequences.

Supreme Court’s View (Court’s Observation)

The Supreme Court has tried to strike a balance in this matter:

Interim relief continues: At present, the court has continued Kheda’s interim bail, which protects him from immediate arrest.

Collection of FIR: The court had earlier also indicated that complaints filed in different states could be transferred to a single place (possibly Lucknow or a fixed location) to streamline the legal process.

Next hearing: Considering the seriousness of the matter, the court has given time to file a detailed reply and has fixed the next date.

political implications

This legal battle has now taken the form of a big political dispute. While the Congress is calling it an attempt to ‘suppress the voice of democracy’, the BJP and the Assam government are calling it an ‘insult to the Prime Minister’ and a matter of ‘legal accountability’.